> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> shane fowler
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:10 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk
> 600 analog connections. Some rooms have 2-3 phones
ssion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shane
> fowler
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:10 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
As others have already posted about methods to reduce the number of T1s
into your Asterisk box, I will look at some other issues, and a differnt
angle.
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 12:09 -0500, shane fowler wrote:
> we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone system
> over to aste
Oh one more thing. There is a 300 foot limit to Ethernet. Also the
minimum number of wires is 4.
shane fowler wrote:
we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone
system over to asterisk or if it's possible at all. The building is
two sections containing a large office se
If your rooms analog phones are wired with cat 3 cabling you can do 10
Mb over it. Convert all the rooms to Ethernet and use large switches.
One Asterisk box should do the trick. Remember not every room will be
using the phone system at the same time. This should work for you.
shane fowle
And then you'd need to purchase 700 VoIP phones; not a small investment.
With all due respect to Mr. Schelin, I think the analog method may be
best, unless you plan to expand the services that you offer to the
guests. If the rooms did have cat3, you could eventually expand your
offering to include
Andy Hamilton wrote:
And then you'd need to purchase 700 VoIP phones; not a small investment. With all due respect to Mr. Schelin, I think the analog method may be best, unless you plan to expand the services that you offer to the guests. If the rooms did have cat3, you could eventually expand you
How does his choice of analog or ethernet/SIP phones in the rooms make
a difference for E911? They'd still be interfacing with the same
Asterisk box and using the same outgoing trunks. And if the setup
handles E911 properly for one (which I don't believe would be
possible), it would do it for the o
*snipped
I'm not saying its a bad idea, but some information about what they're
hoping to gain, the type of clientelle they have, and how much they're
willing to spend (i.e. would they see a benefit to tying this into
wiring ethernet to all the rooms for guest use and giving higher-end
business cli
Good point. Here is another Suggestion. Why not use the existing analog
phones to their PBX and go out to channel banks for their phone line
trunks. Then go to Asterisk for the rest. They don't have 700 trunks.
This will save on equipment costs and you will get some of the benefits
of Aster
The cat 3 issue depends on your phone, if you went with VoIP phones,
you would need to make sure that it could be set/forced to 10Mbps. I
have only used Cisco phones, and, save the 7910 and 7902 (may a few
others), they all are fully capable of doing 100Mbps because of their
internal switch (you ca
The way to do this in my opinion is to stay with analog phones in the
room and *not* ip phones for a couple of reasons:
With Cellphones the way they are right now, you will never recover
and/or justify the costs ($60 per phone plus wiring for IP, vs $5 per
phone and no wiring for analog).
Over comp
12 matches
Mail list logo
