My prior box would do this too, with exactly 99.987793 almost every time
as you saw. It only had a wildcard, x100p. actually, clone maybe. The
other notable difference is that I see you're using apic. have you
tried with the noapic kernel option to see if that changes your results?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:00:28PM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote:
Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but
all that I get is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
99.987793% 99.987793%
Yes,
But I'm reading on the opposite side, or always I loose 1 sample?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest -v
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%
8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%
8192 samples in 8191 sample
Carlos Alperin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%
Is anything wrong about this?
I never get 100.00 % most of the times.
No problem there.