Hi Paul,
Thanks for the message!
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote:
[...]
I am curious..
Have you tried disabling CPU1 by setting isolcpus=1 on the kernel
command line ?
This will make the kernel ignore the second CPU - you can then run
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Begumisa Gerald M
|Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Hi Paul,
|
|Thanks for the message!
|
| On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote
On 4/11/06, Begumisa Gerald M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ,
it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The reason that it
is suggested to disable the IO-APIC is that on many low-end systems,
Allow me to comment
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, stoffell wrote:
Interesting. Now 'why' do they suggest it, is it because older
IO-APIC are 'broken' on some boards? I'm very curious as to 'why',
[...]
Most likely this is why.
Regards,
Gerald
___
--Bandwidth
Gerald M
|Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:13 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Hi Paul,
|
|Thanks for the message!
|
| On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul Hewlett wrote:
| [...]
|
| I am curious
PM
|To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|On Monday 17 April 2006 12:39, Anton Krall wrote:
| I don't know if this only works with multiple cpus but I have HT
| enabled and it shows cpu0 and cpu1 .. I tried the first part of this
| email
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 21:45, Begumisa Gerald M wrote:
Hi,
I've been battling with a similar issue:
a) I wrote a script to periodically run the command cat
/proc/interrupts and figure out the interrupts per second. I run this
script for over 24 hours and never once did the difference
On Monday 10 April 2006 19:20, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel option. Notice
this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your
boards on different REAL irqs.
Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 19:25 -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Anton Krall wrote:
I will try that and see what happens...
This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on
supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them?
If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does
-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|On Monday 10 April 2006 19:20, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote:
| Try booting with apic off, I think it's noapic kernel
|option. Notice
| this is APIC and not ACPI, which you referred to. Then get your
| boards on different REAL irqs.
|
|Please do not open
Zttool shows no irqmisses on the te110p card?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Kenneth Lussier
|Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:05 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Please do not open your mouth to spout nonsense if you do not know
what you're talking about.
[...]
Again, if the IO-APIC is reporting that the card is on its own IRQ,
it really, truly, honestly *IS* on its own IRQ. The
Hi,
I've been battling with a similar issue:
a) I wrote a script to periodically run the command cat
/proc/interrupts and figure out the interrupts per second. I run this
script for over 24 hours and never once did the difference between the
preceeding and succeeding interrupt counts go below
use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts..On 4/10/06, Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the
same system:Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -vOpened pseudo
PeruSent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PMTo: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts..
On 4/10/06, Anton
Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guys.
I have an issue
... :(
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Infobox Peru
*Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2006 5:47 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
use lspci -vb
Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled?
If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT.
Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare PCI slots).
CPU0 CPU1
0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer
___
:47 PM
| *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
| *Subject:* Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
| use lspci -vb for detecting interrupt conflicts..
|
| On 4/10/06, *Anton Krall* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Boris Bakchiev
|Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 6:26 PM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled?
|If it is P4, I would recommend to disable
-Users] te110p and interrupts
|
|Is this dual CPU/Core or just P4 with HT enabled?
|If it is P4, I would recommend to disable HT.
|
|Try changing PCI slots for one of the cards (if you have spare
|PCI slots).
|
| CPU0 CPU1
| 0: 17697848 17714488IO-APIC-edge timer
Anton Krall wrote:
I will try that and see what happens...
This server is a supermicro one.. Anybody else had issues like this on
supermicro? Any hints on how to resolv them?
If I remember correctly, supermicro bios does let you assign irq to certain
pci ports right? Will that help?
Also, is
Damn :) any others?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Eric ManxPower Wieling
|Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:25 PM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] te110p and interrupts
22 matches
Mail list logo
