--- Kevin Bockman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing
[1;36;40mDial[0;37;40m([1;35;40mSIP/101-ad89[0;37;40m,
[1;35;40mIAX2/voipjet/4803442640[0;37;40m) in new stack
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Called voipjet/4803442640
May 12 22:27:05
I am not an expert yet ;)...but VoipJet is very picky.. in your exten =
when I tried with the default it didn't work, when tried as they ask in the
FAQ's it workedyou must keep the exact format with the account
number...
[Voipjet]
exten = _1NXXNXX,1,SetCallerID(4153574000); Set your
Personally I thought that VOIPJET has the best service and
documentation including simple up to date CDRs also.
They do not offer incoming, at least not to me
If you follow the instructions on their site it will work, if you are
useing AAH then maybe you should look into editing the files by
VoipJet are not too bad, little pricey though.. theres better around.. a
matter of looking :-)
Regards,
Sahil Gupta
VoiceValley
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Andrew Latham wrote:
Personally I thought that VOIPJET has the best service and
documentation including simple up to date CDRs also.
They do not
I agree. I've been using voipjet since before their formal launch..I
have account number 63. They've been amongst the most reliable in my
experience. If they offered DIDs in my area I'd have those as well.
Michael
On Fri, 13 May 2005 07:42:32 -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
Personally I thought
I'm #11 but I have notice of late a few problems but nothing major
given the price differences assuming you don't have the volume to
commit to another carrier directly for the destinations you are
after.
-- William
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
Personally I thought that VOIPJET has the best service and documentation
including simple up to date CDRs also.
They do not offer incoming, at least not to me
If you follow the instructions on their site it will work, if you are
useing AAH
Latham; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
VoipJet are not too bad, little pricey though.. theres better around.. a
matter of looking :-)
Regards,
Sahil Gupta
VoiceValley
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Andrew Latham wrote:
Personally I
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing
[1;36;40mDial[0;37;40m([1;35;40mSIP/101-ad89[0;37;40m,
[1;35;40mIAX2/voipjet/4803442640[0;37;40m) in new stack May 12
22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Called voipjet/4803442640 May 12 22:27:05
WARNING[2442
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bockman
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing
On Fri, 13 May 2005 07:59:09 -0700
Wiley Siler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Almost positive iLBC is not allowed Use uLaw...
They do allow for iLBC. From their FAQ page:
Codecs. Carriers with primarily business customers should
use the G.711 codec when sending VoIP traffic to VoipJet.
This
Robert Webb wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 07:59:09 -0700
Wiley Siler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Almost positive iLBC is not allowed Use uLaw...
They do allow for iLBC. From their FAQ page:
Codecs. Carriers with primarily business customers should use the G.711
codec when sending VoIP traffic to
Good catch. Did not see the FAQ.
Robert, are you the one having problems getting this running in AAH?
W
-Original Message-
From: Robert Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:22 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wiley Siler
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Adamson
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 9:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
Look a little closer...
WARNING[2442]: Call rejected by 66.246.220.19: No such context/extension
that certainly
] On Behalf Of Wiley Siler
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:48 AM
To: Andrew Latham; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
I use AAH with VoipJet and it works perfectly. Setup was a breeze with
absolutely no hand coding of configs required
-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
It would be nice if you post how you set this up to either the wiki or
right here. Just a few lines would do nicely. There seems to be allot
of people who use voipjet and aah and both are good products.
Thanks
-Original
://techdatapros.com IT/VoIP Consultants
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wiley Siler
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 8:49 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] voipjet anyone?
You
Is it me... or is it voipjet?
This week I've been trying various providers, just can't seem to get
voipjet to work.
I signed up with voipjet but so far can't get it to work inbound or out
bound.
I always get 'all circuits busy'.
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing
International calls must be prefixed as 011 to voipjet.
Regards,
Sahil Gupta
VoiceValley
On Thu, 12 May 2005, JD wrote:
Is it me... or is it voipjet?
This week I've been trying various providers, just can't seem to get voipjet
to work.
I signed up with voipjet but so far can't get it to work
Kevin Bockman wrote:
Is it me... or is it voipjet?
This week I've been trying various providers, just can't seem to get
voipjet to work.
I signed up with voipjet but so far can't get it to work inbound or out
bound.
I always get 'all circuits busy'.
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing
[1;36;40mDial[0;37;40m([1;35;40mSIP/101-ad89[0;37;40m,
[1;35;40mIAX2/voipjet/4803442640[0;37;40m) in new stack
May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Called voipjet/4803442640
May 12 22:27:05 WARNING[2442]: Call rejected by 66.246.220.19: No such
21 matches
Mail list logo
