On 9 Mar 2007, at 17:51, Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3) wrote:
I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with *
I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the
calls from
the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five
* boxes.
The * boxes run AGI
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, David Ruggles wrote:
I've got
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, David
: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:58 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing
telco servers are Supermicro 2.8GHz P4, 1GB, Digium te410p with 2 PRI
plugged in.
application server is HP DL380 3.06GHz Xeon x2 (4 cores), 3GB, Digium
Anyway, back to your question, how about your head system running an AGI
that connects to the manager interface on the IVR boxes to find out how
many calls each is currently processing? You could set a channel variable
with the least busy host name and use that in your dial statement.
09, 2007 10:59 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Call load balancing
Anyway, back to your question, how about your head system running an AGI
that connects to the manager interface on the IVR boxes to find out how
many calls
I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with *
I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the calls from
the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five * boxes.
The * boxes run AGI scripts to process the IVR calls. Can I load balance the
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, David Ruggles wrote:
I've got a system I'm putting together to handle IVR calls with *
I have one head system that terminates two PRIs. It routes the calls from
the PRIs to * boxes using IAX I'm planning on having four or five * boxes.
The * boxes run AGI scripts to process
On 10 Aug 2005, at 16:48, Michiel van Baak wrote:On 08:45, Wed 10 Aug 05, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: 1) your provider is voluntarily screwing up VoIP traffic2) some idiot purposingly fills up your pipe with UDP traffic If they fill the pipe with TCP traffic, UDP will be dead aswell. Protocols don't
On 09:15, Thu 11 Aug 05, tim panton wrote:
On 10 Aug 2005, at 16:48, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 08:45, Wed 10 Aug 05, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
1) your provider is voluntarily screwing up VoIP traffic
2) some idiot purposingly fills up your pipe with UDP traffic
If they fill the
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
Dave Redmore wrote:
Hello All,
Wondering what sort of real world mileage people are getting out of
different internet connecions - i.e. different DSL connection speeds,
cable modems, etc... Is it reasonable to hope to carry 10 - 15
concurrent calls on a 768K DSL?
I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable
difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are
using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your upload
rate since VoIP calls send data bidirectionally.
Snip ...
Jean-Michel, hi;
Is
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 08:10 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable
difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are
using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your upload
rate
On 08:45, Wed 10 Aug 05, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
1) your provider is voluntarily screwing up VoIP traffic
2) some idiot purposingly fills up your pipe with UDP traffic
If they fill the pipe with TCP traffic, UDP will be dead as
well. Protocols don't matter, bandwidth does.
--
Michiel van
Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 08:10 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable
difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are
using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your
Dave Redmore wrote:
Hello All,
Wondering what sort of real world mileage people are getting out of
different internet connecions - i.e. different DSL connection speeds,
cable modems, etc... Is it reasonable to hope to carry 10 - 15
concurrent calls on a 768K DSL? I'm not talking about
---
An ever better way is get some kind of SLA with guaranteed uptime and
bandwith, a symetrical link, and do some traffic shaping to ensure that
VoIP has priority. Part of the point of VoIP is to save money by
collapsing voice and data networks onto one (presumably
I am doing traffic shaping with a open source linux firewall
http://www.ipcop.org/
and since i have traffic shaping configured my 3 VoIP lines work great.
I am not using Asterix yet but I will go to as soon as I have the time
to work myself into it.
If anybody can tell me where the best
Darren Wright wrote:
---
An ever better way is get some kind of SLA with guaranteed uptime and
bandwith, a symetrical link, and do some traffic shaping to ensure that
VoIP has priority. Part of the point of VoIP is to save money by
collapsing voice and data networks
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 08:10 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
I do up to 10 g.729 channels over 1024 / 256 DSL without noticeable
difference in call statistics (i.e. avg length of calls). If you are
using ADSL, the maximum bandwith you'll be able to use is your upload
rate since VoIP calls
20 matches
Mail list logo
