Re: [asterisk-users] Centos kernel 34 vs. 42?

2006-10-14 Thread Remco Barendse
I'm now running kernel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL Not really an answer to your question, but I found out all kernels above 2.6.16 do a better job on asterisk systems then the ones before that. No idea how this is possible as I'm in no way familiar with the inner workings of the linux kernel, but I

Re: [asterisk-users] Centos kernel 34 vs. 42?

2006-10-14 Thread Bryan J . Smith
From: Remco Barendse Possibly, but I would have to start worrying about kernel configs, compiling the lot and solving the problem of the box no longer being able to boot the kernel :) You'd be better off starting with a Fedora kernel. Unfortunately RHEL/CentOS 4 is based on Fedora Core 3

RE: [asterisk-users] Centos kernel 34 vs. 42?

2006-10-14 Thread Robert Jenkins
-users] Centos kernel 34 vs. 42? From: Remco Barendse Possibly, but I would have to start worrying about kernel configs, compiling the lot and solving the problem of the box no longer being able to boot the kernel :) You'd be better off starting with a Fedora kernel

Re: [asterisk-users] Centos kernel 34 vs. 42?

2006-10-13 Thread Michiel van Baak
On Oct 13, 2006, at 7:58 PM, Remco Barendse wrote: Hi list! I read the trixbox anouncement that they downgraded to kernel version 34 to get rid of some audio problems I'm not running trixbox but normal Centos 4 with asterisk installed. I tried to find some further info on this but couldn't