Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-06-01 Thread Jerry Jones
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA Channel banks would work. Rhino works well, or if you need more chassis density, try the Carrier Access ADIT600 configured with FXS blades. Cory J Andrews From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-06-01 Thread Natambu Obleton
i have deployed the audiocodes mp-124? with 14 lines active lines and it ugly to configure, but works well once setup. They do make it easy if you have a set of contiguous number to apply to the ports in order though. On 5/31/07, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at

Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Erik Anderson
On 5/31/07, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to find a high port count ATA device. We have a lot (up to 110) analog devices that we need to bridge to IP. Rather than go out and buy 110 ATA's, it would make more sense to buy a single chassis type device with some number of

RE: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Cory Andrews
Channel banks would work. Rhino works well, or if you need more chassis density, try the Carrier Access ADIT600 configured with FXS blades. Cory J Andrews From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Garstang Sent: Thursday, May

Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:22:06PM -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote: I’m trying to find a high port count ATA device. We have a lot (up to 110) analog devices that we need to bridge to IP. Rather than go out and buy 110 ATA’s, it would make more sense to buy a single chassis type

RE: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Fuermann, Jason Bryce
I know Citel offers a 24 port device. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Garstang Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA I'm trying to find a high port

Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Alex Balashov
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Douglas Garstang wrote: I'm trying to find a high port count ATA device. We have a lot (up to 110) analog devices that we need to bridge to IP. Rather than go out and buy 110 ATA's, it would make more sense to buy a single chassis type device with some number of ports

RE: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Douglas Garstang
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA Channel banks would work. Rhino works well, or if you need more chassis density, try the Carrier Access ADIT600 configured with FXS blades. Cory J Andrews

Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
On 5/31/07, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:22:06PM -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote: I'm trying to find a high port count ATA device. We have a lot (up to 110) analog devices that we need to bridge to IP. Rather than go out and buy 110 ATA's, it

Re: [asterisk-users] High Port Count ATA

2007-05-31 Thread Nick Seraphin
Those 24+ port devices get *really* expensive, *really* fast. I would probably go with the new Linksys SPA-8000 (I think that's the model number)... its an 8-port FXS adapter and is only around $300 or so. So 110 ports, you would need 14 of them... $4200 with the advantage that if one dies,