At 09:29 AM 5/3/2007, you wrote:
I guess we are. I propose we add functions or procedures!
How about we just start over and make it a proper language?
Not that I don't love it, but the hoops that one has to jump through
because it's not cause my hair to disappear at an ever faster rate.
Ira
Andreas Sikkema wrote:
You're so right!
I thought about having just a catchall _. extension in the
dialplan and doing everything else in a "real" language via AGI -
PHP, Perl, ... whichever you like. It would make the programming
part much easier as the scope of variables is just as you
expect i
> You're so right!
>
> I thought about having just a catchall _. extension in the
> dialplan and doing everything else in a "real" language via AGI -
> PHP, Perl, ... whichever you like. It would make the programming
> part much easier as the scope of variables is just as you
> expect it to be.
W
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Doug Garstang wrote:
I have a large dial plan here with over 3000 lines, and several dozen
macros. As it grew, it became apparent that there was some problems.
1. When you pass arguments to a macro in the form of $ARG1, $ARG2 etc,
if that macro calls another macro,
Doug Garstang wrote:
> I have a large dial plan here with over 3000 lines, and several dozen
> macros. As it grew, it became apparent that there was some problems.
>
> 1. When you pass arguments to a macro in the form of $ARG1, $ARG2 etc,
> if that macro calls another macro, and passes argument
Doug Garstang wrote:
> I have a large dial plan here with over 3000 lines, and several dozen
> macros. As it grew, it became apparent that there was some problems.
>
> 1. When you pass arguments to a macro in the form of $ARG1, $ARG2 etc,
> if that macro calls another macro, and passes argument
