On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 09:21 +, Tim Panton wrote:
> On 8 Feb 2007, at 12:33, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:41:30AM +, Tim Panton wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5 Feb 2007, at 21:46, chester c young wrote:
> >>
> >>> Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only brow
why don't think to sugarcrm, it has an asterisk package, so you
benefit of asterisk & sugarcrm at the same time
Younss AZZAYANI
Junior IT Manager
Robinson Network
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
On 8 Feb 2007, at 12:33, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:41:30AM +, Tim Panton wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007, at 21:46, chester c young wrote:
Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser
and softphone.
You might want to consider our lightweight java softph
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:41:30AM +, Tim Panton wrote:
>
> On 5 Feb 2007, at 21:46, chester c young wrote:
>
> >Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser
> >and softphone.
>
> You might want to consider our lightweight java softphone (Corraleta
> SDK) - it can be
> Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser
> and softphone.
You might want to consider our lightweight java softphone (Corraleta
SDK) - it can be embedded in
a web page - zero install/config in the client. The UI is in HTML and
javascript,
so you can get it _exactly_ the
; Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 3:31 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphone on Linux
>
> On 10:43, Wed 07 Feb 07, chester c young wrote:
> > please send me more info
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> &
On 10:43, Wed 07 Feb 07, chester c young wrote:
> please send me more info
>
> thanks!
>
> Tim Panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Feb 2007, at 21:46, chester c young wrote:
>
> > Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser
> > and softphone.
>
> You might want to
please send me more info
thanks!
Tim Panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007, at 21:46, chester c young wrote:
> Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser
> and softphone.
You might want to consider our lightweight java softphone (Corraleta
SDK) - it can be
On 5 Feb 2007, at 21:46, chester c young wrote:
Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser
and softphone.
You might want to consider our lightweight java softphone (Corraleta
SDK) - it can be embedded in
a web page - zero install/config in the client. The UI is in HT
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 22:37 +, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, chester c young wrote:
>
> > Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser and
> > softphone.
> >
> > Any recomendations?
>
> Idefisk for the softphone.
>
I agree idefisk. Is light and supports
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, chester c young wrote:
Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser and
softphone.
Any recomendations?
Idefisk for the softphone.
Lynx for the browser ;-)
Gordon
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:46:24PM -0800, chester c young wrote:
> Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser and
> softphone.
If you want to avoid the geckos, then try kiax and konqueror, or kiax
and twinkle. It may turn out to be lighter than firefox in total.
--
chester c young wrote:
> Need to deploy between 50 to 300 lightweight Linux - only browser and
> softphone.
>
> Any recomendations?
I use X-lite every day. It works a heck of a lot better under Linux than
Windos, but it does have some anoying UI bugs.
As for the browser, how lightweight?
What b
13 matches
Mail list logo
