Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-17 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:57:51AM -0600, Danny Nicholas wrote: > Ok isn't this replacing a "western hack" with a "bridge hack"? The "init > 0" and "init 6" probably aren't going to work anyway since (1) asterisk has > to be running as root and I have already mentioned that this is a requiremen

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-17 Thread Danny Nicholas
would work unless you had a copy or symlink in the asterisk directory. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:26 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subje

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:15:08AM -0500, Alexander Lopez wrote: > This will hang-up all channels even if multiples channels are open... > > > Exten => _86,1,system(“init 0”) > > Use with Caution…☺ Only if Asterisk is running as root. Which is not recommended, anyway. And besides, I think

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-15 Thread Alexander Lopez
isk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lenz Emilitri Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:52 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI? This version will hang up the given extension even if it has multiple chann

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 06:08:45PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:34:12 +0100, Lenz Emilitri wrote: > > > This is a bit of trickery, but could not resist :) > > > > This will kill a channel that is connected to SIP/201 > > > > asterisk -rx "soft hangup $(asterisk -rx 'show c

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-14 Thread Dinesh Nair
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:34:12 +0100, Lenz Emilitri wrote: > This is a bit of trickery, but could not resist :) > > This will kill a channel that is connected to SIP/201 > > asterisk -rx "soft hangup $(asterisk -rx 'show channels' | grep SIP/201 > | awk '{ print $1 '} )" what if there're also ch

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-13 Thread Tim Nelson
You guys think YOU'RE overdoing it... your solution works with a single line. My solution was some convoluted 100 line shell script! Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 - "Lenz Emilitri" wrote: > I have a feeling we're overdoing it :) l. > > 2009

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-13 Thread Lenz Emilitri
x27;{ > print $1 '} )") > > Where dialing 861234 would hangup extension 1234 > > If this needs refinement, will repost: > > > -Original Message- > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Beh

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-12 Thread Lenz Emilitri
I have a feeling we're overdoing it :) l. 2009/2/12 Lukas Rypl > > > asterisk -rx "soft hangup $(asterisk -rx 'core show channels' | grep > SIP/7000 > > > Hi, > > I used this way of processing output from asterisk 1.2 and found out > that it is not 100% safe because there can appear unprintab

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-12 Thread Lukas Rypl
> asterisk -rx "soft hangup $(asterisk -rx 'core show channels' | grep SIP/7000 Hi, I used this way of processing output from asterisk 1.2 and found out that it is not 100% safe because there can appear unprintable characters in the output. This will cause the following grep command to show m

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-12 Thread Danny Nicholas
ld hangup extension 1234 If this needs refinement, will repost: -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Helius Ferreira Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:42 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sub

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-12 Thread Helius Ferreira
Asterisk 1.6 implements the "hangup" on the channel you just made the call and I used it with this command (apparently) asterisk -rx "soft hangup $(asterisk -rx 'core show channels' | grep SIP/7000| awk '{ print $1 '} )" In my asterisk system: debian*CLI> core show channels Channel

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-11 Thread Lenz Emilitri
This is a bit of trickery, but could not resist :) This will kill a channel that is connected to SIP/201 asterisk -rx "soft hangup $(asterisk -rx 'show channels' | grep SIP/201 | awk '{ print $1 '} )" It basically calls *, gets the list of channels, filters them out to get the channel name and

Re: [asterisk-users] Hangup extensions via CLI?

2009-02-09 Thread Alexander Lopez
Have you looked at soft hangup > -Original Message- > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tim Nelson > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:29 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Su