On 10/28/2010 3:41 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> 2) if you've got some iptables rules for limiting inbound SIP by rate?
exactly what i was going through; here's how i reacted (throttles both
SSH and SIP Register:
First, I completely blocked all non-North American & Amazon EC2 networks
- I won't be re
Two incidents in two weeks is not bad. I get 2-4 a day. There must be many
here with even more than that. You should start considering some safety
practices like disabling long distance and international calls by default,
put a cap on long distance and international calls even for genuine users,
an
Fail2Ban
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "Per Jessen"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:41 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] being bombarded with SIP packets
> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where our
> asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more
Gordon Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Norbert Zawodsky wrote:
>
>> Am 28.10.2010 12:14, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>> Ishfaq Malik wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 09:41 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents"
> where our asterisk
Norbert Zawodsky wrote:
> Per,
>
> (didn't want to be unfriendly to you !)
Not at all.
> As you say, "you don't like anything to modify your firewal". My
> words!
>
> Someone (don't remember who & when) on this list showed me a very
> clever trick (=iptables rule) to drop the packets if
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Norbert Zawodsky wrote:
Am 28.10.2010 12:14, schrieb Per Jessen:
Ishfaq Malik wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 09:41 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where
our asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) b
Am 28.10.2010 12:14, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Ishfaq Malik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 09:41 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where
>>> our asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) by SIP
>>> packets. Once from 114.31
Ishfaq Malik wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 09:41 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where
>> our asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) by SIP
>> packets. Once from 114.31.50.10, second time from 173.212.200.146.
>> We b
Norbert Zawodsky wrote:
> Am 28.10.2010 09:41, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where
>> our asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) by SIP
>> packets. Once from 114.31.50.10, second time from 173.212.200.146.
>> We became
Am 28.10.2010 09:41, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where our
> asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) by SIP
> packets. Once from 114.31.50.10, second time from 173.212.200.146. We
> became aware of the problem when bandw
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 09:41 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Over the last two weeks, we have had at least two "incidents" where our
> asterisk server got flooded (a hundred or more per second) by SIP
> packets. Once from 114.31.50.10, second time from 173.212.200.146. We
> became aware of the problem
11 matches
Mail list logo
