Re: [Astlinux-users] Any bximage (bochs) experts out there?

2009-12-02 Thread Terry Markovich
As far as I know, the number of heads and sectors-per-track bximage reports is just a convenient fiction. Cylinders * heads * spt * 512(block size) = image size. Why do you need that specific geometry? Terry Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > I'm trying to "pre-image" Astlinux for a CF of a given

[Astlinux-users] Any bximage (bochs) experts out there?

2009-12-02 Thread Philip A. Prindeville
I'm trying to "pre-image" Astlinux for a CF of a given size and geometry, but when I do: ./bximage -q -hd -mode=flat -size=1953 runnix.img fdisk reports back to me that the partition table of the image runnix.img is C=3968, H=16, S=63. I need it to be H=64, S=63 to be correct. Anyone know how

Re: [Astlinux-users] Some beta images finally for 0.7

2009-12-02 Thread Ionel Chila
Running it now on net4801... Smooth install, great additions to web interface and under the hood, everything works. AWESOME job guys - Original Message From: Darrick Hartman To: AstLinux Users Mailing List ; AstLinux Developers Mailing List Sent: Sun, November 1, 2009 8:58:24 PM

Re: [Astlinux-users] Some beta images finally for 0.7

2009-12-02 Thread Tom Chadwin
Further 0.7 observations... 1. Migration from Zaptel to DAHDI following astlinux.org documentation seems to have worked perfectly. 2. The VPMADT032 (or whatever it's called) hardware echo-canceller which comes with the TDM410P looks as though it works out of the box (as far as dmesg is concerned

Re: [Astlinux-users] Some beta images finally for 0.7

2009-12-02 Thread Tom Chadwin
Thanks for the fix, Lonnie. Interestingly, I have read at least one opinion that IE's placement of the scrollbar within the element is correct, and other browsers are those which are incorrectly interpreting the CSS spec. I think this is the best solution for now, and is likely to have a long enoug