Re: [Astlinux-users] suggestions for AGI scripts

2010-07-20 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Shamus, The problem is that the standard AstLinux PHP is the cgi version, so a script... -- #!/usr/bin/php -- yields... -- X-Powered-By: PHP/5.2.13 Content-type: text/html hello -- no doubt the extra three lines is causing you problems. You may find a cleaver approach to work around this. If

Re: [Astlinux-users] 5501 Stress tests

2010-07-20 Thread Matt Riddell
On 17/07/10 2:52 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Yup, it's not looking good at all. > > In the pure SIP domain I can route 50 calls concurrently (haven't tried > any more than that) and it was solid for over 2 hours after which I > stopped the test. > > In the T1 domain using a Digium TE110P I can't get

Re: [Astlinux-users] suggestions for AGI scripts

2010-07-20 Thread Shamus Rask
I've transferred over my old PHP script onto my AstLinux install and it is not working (worked perfectly on Ubuntu/Asterisk). I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting it--where would I find error messages/logs? Can anyone see any obvious mistakes in the following? --> called in extensions.conf

Re: [Astlinux-users] Bug in firewall gui?

2010-07-20 Thread James Babiak
Michael, While obviously you'll want to block these attacks when you see them, as long as you use secure credentials for these remote extensions, you shouldn't have to worry too much about this attacker actually managing to compromise a SIP account. While you'll probably want to keep the exten

Re: [Astlinux-users] Bug in firewall gui?

2010-07-20 Thread Michael Keuter
>I used the sip-voip plugin. It worked fine. However, security is not enough, >it seems to me. I am experiencing hacker attacks on the open port 5060. > >So, I am wondering, what could be a better solution. Maybe would be >interesting to not use port 5060 for external devices. Then the firewall >wo

Re: [Astlinux-users] Bug in firewall gui?

2010-07-20 Thread Michael
I used the sip-voip plugin. It worked fine. However, security is not enough, it seems to me. I am experiencing hacker attacks on the open port 5060. So, I am wondering, what could be a better solution. Maybe would be interesting to not use port 5060 for external devices. Then the firewall would