If it were me, I would turn of the "routing" and wireless part of your DSL
Router and just bridge directly to Astlinux. Astlinux would then become the
router in your network and I would connect a Wireless AP or Router (in
Bridge mode, routing turned off here too) to the LAN side of Astlinux.
Note
Tom,
Ahhh, you don't want to require your clients to have a IPSec client (Thanks
David).
No, other then David's VLAN suggestion, either requiring the clients to have a
IPSec client, or add a WiFi Access Point behind (instead of in front) of the
Remote AstLinux is needed.
You must get the 'cli
Tom,
I believe I have configured a very similar environment in my test lab, however
I have used OpenVPN to do it. Basically, I have two pbx's linked via a VPN
which passes my SIP traffic as well as anything else. Any client on the LAN
side of either pbx can communicate with clients on the other
Lonnie may not have been clear enough. It will work only if each client
has their own VPN client installed. Apple devices have it built in, for
Windows you will have to download a client and run it.
If the clients do not have a IPSec VPN Client and you are trying to use the
AstLinux box as a bri
Am I getting confused? I don't think I've explained myself fully. The IPSec
VPN is between two AstLinux boxes. Head office has one Astlinux box, remote
office has another. The description I gave before was that of the remote
office. I want the clients at the remote office to connect over the
Astlin
Tom,
It should, use this as a guide... give it a test.
http://doc.astlinux.org/userdoc:tt_ipsec_vpn_apple_ios
Lonnie
On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Tom Chadwin wrote:
> Single IPs. I'm looking for a solution to the problem that my net5501
> doesn't have wifi, but the router behind which it sit
Single IPs. I'm looking for a solution to the problem that my net5501
doesn't have wifi, but the router behind which it sits does. That's the only
thing I'm trying to solve.
So it should work?
Thanks
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Lonnie Abelbeck [mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com]
Sent:
Tom,
Are these 'clients' single IP's or subnets ?
Assuming single IP's like mobile iOS, PC's, etc. using IPsec/XAuth (IPsec
Mobile on AstLinux) should work, no different then if they originated via the
public internet.
You can "Push Network(s)" to the clients, but only if they support the Cisc
Hello all
Subject line does not explain this very well. I've successfully set up
AstLinux IPSec VPNs before. However, I'd like to know if it is possible to
set it up as follows:
Internet
|
DSL router - client
|
Astlinux
More precisely, Astlinux would be cabled to the DSL router, while clie
perhaps can be a good solution use a 2,5" Solid State Disk or a 2,5" 44
pin IDE hard disk in behalf of compact flash, or use an external USB HD
to store log files...
I remember to have an old astlinux (0.4.x) installation on a net4801
using a 2,5" IDE 44 pin HD...
bye
Graziano
Il 02/10/2012 1
Am 02.10.2012 um 16:31 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck:
> Christopher,
>
> While using a temp file on RAM sounds like a good idea, it could actually be
> 'harder' on the CF card since you are writing the cumulative day's file every
> 30 minutes, the total bytes written for the day would be many times
Christopher,
While using a temp file on RAM sounds like a good idea, it could actually be
'harder' on the CF card since you are writing the cumulative day's file every
30 minutes, the total bytes written for the day would be many times larger than
the day's end size.
It could be that appending
If there is an IDE interface, try using a CF microdrive.
Regards
Frank
From: The Cadillac Kid
Reply-To: The Cadillac Kid , AstLinux Users Mailing
List
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Astlinux group
Subject: [Astlinux-users] Best storage for soekris NET5501 (high writes)
w
I had wondered if I stored the log in a Ramdisk then have a CRON Job write it
to CF every 30 minutes or so would help..
its not CDR we are writing.. its the actual asterisk Log.. basically a Verbose
console output to a file.. currently the log file is stored as it is created
right to flash,
Am 02.10.2012 um 13:40 schrieb Michael Keuter:
>
> Am 02.10.2012 um 13:24 schrieb The Cadillac Kid:
>
>> what is the best storage option for the NET-5501 for a High write
>> situation...
>> a USB stick is not an option as it will likely end up tampered with... im a
>> bit concerned about CF
Am 02.10.2012 um 13:24 schrieb The Cadillac Kid:
> what is the best storage option for the NET-5501 for a High write situation...
> a USB stick is not an option as it will likely end up tampered with... im a
> bit concerned about CF cards,, as I have has one fail with only 9 months..
> it co
what is the best storage option for the NET-5501 for a High write situation...
a USB stick is not an option as it will likely end up tampered with... im a
bit concerned about CF cards,, as I have has one fail with only 9 months.. it
could be defective, but i somehow think it could be tied to t
17 matches
Mail list logo
