Yes I had not heard of them either. External antennas will be nice.
Interesting point about more basic the better as it means fewer security entry
points. I suppose you have a point there but not sure if it could be applied in
all scenarios. I would probably prefer to be using an appliance that i
> Am 14.10.2018 um 23:53 schrieb Michael Keuter :
>
>>
>> Am 14.10.2018 um 23:03 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck :
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>>> As I am now moving to router mode rather than bridge mode for the 4G
>>> device, the Netgear LB21XX is too basic for me.
>>
>> Can you explain what the Netgear
> Am 14.10.2018 um 23:03 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck :
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> As I am now moving to router mode rather than bridge mode for the 4G device,
>> the Netgear LB21XX is too basic for me.
>
> Can you explain what the Netgear in router mode is missing ? Works perfectly
> for me.
>
> I w
Hi Michael,
> As I am now moving to router mode rather than bridge mode for the 4G device,
> the Netgear LB21XX is too basic for me.
Can you explain what the Netgear in router mode is missing ? Works perfectly
for me.
I would argue the more basic the better, fewer security entry points.
OTOH
To the group
As I am now moving to router mode rather than bridge mode for the 4G device,
the Netgear LB21XX is too basic for me.
As such, I am going to try out this device which looks very interesting. Its
based on OpenWRT.
https://teltonika.lt/product/rut240/
Interesting that it can support
