Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

sk-13.0/ > > And then I copied the .so files to /usr/lib/asterisk/modules. Then, I had to > define opus in codecs.conf. Now I'm in business! > > From: mgra...@mstvp.com <mgra...@mstvp.com> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 12:45 PM > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

://www.mgraves.org o(713) 861-4005 c(713) 201-1262 sip:mgra...@mjg.onsip.com skype mjgraves - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support From: "Josh" <jma...@hotmail.com> Date: 4/17/17 10:48 am To: "AstLinux Users Mailing

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

ct: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support I suggest that your past experience was based upon wholly avoiding and kind of digital anything. A wholly analog path placed no arbitrary constraints on the performance. Add any kind of traditional telecom digital device and you will not see that same perfo

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

From: David Kerr <da...@kerr.net> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 8:08 PM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support I was about to reply to Josh with much the same comments... if the ultimate device is an analog attached telephone then it is unnecessar

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

> Anyone know of a VoIP trunk vendor that will support HD voice codecs... and > keep HD through its paths if the other end also supports HD? In reality, what you're asking for is an ITSP that doesn't always proxy the media. That allows the end-points to freely negotiate the codec in-use,

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

<k...@kriskinc.com> *Sent:* Sunday, April 16, 2017 10:36 PM *To:* AstLinux Users Mailing List *Subject:* Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support My general assumption was that you were using a cordless phone (one of t

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

; an analog phone, but improvement will definitely be noticed, at least by my > ears, using an "HD" codec with an analog phone such as a Western Electric > 2500 or 500 set. > > > Josh > > > From: David Kerr <da...@kerr.net> &

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

__ > From: David Kerr <da...@kerr.net> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 8:08 PM > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support > > I was about to reply to Josh with much the same comments... if the ultimate > d

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

lbeck > <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com<mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com>> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 11:42 AM > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support > > Josh, > > To be clear, upgrading the base system to Asterisk

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

> > unlocking a device I don't want to accidentally brick) took considerably > > longer. > > > > > > Josh > > > > > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 11

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

ly-To: AstLinux List <astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Date: Monday, 17 April 2017 at 6:13 am > To: AstLinux List <astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support > > Hi Josh, > > The availability of Opus on an ATA is a

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

et> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support Hi Josh, The availability of Opus on an ATA is a little strange because virtually any analog POTS device you connect to it will undoubtedly have filters and/or other hardware limitations in place for the 300 - 3300Hz frequency range sup

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

> > Josh > > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 11:42 AM > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support > > Josh, > > To be clear, upgra

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

gt; Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 11:42 AM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support Josh, To be clear, upgrading the base system to Asterisk 13 is easy, but you will have to tweak your Asterisk configuration. This URL, at the end look for "Upgrade Note

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

h > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 9:05 AM > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support > > Hi Josh, (comments inline) > > On Apr 15, 2017, at 9:46 PM, Josh <jma.

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

! Josh From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 9:05 AM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support Hi Josh, (comments inline) On Apr 15, 2017, at 9:46 PM, Josh <jma...@hotmail.c

Re: [Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

Hi Josh, (comments inline) On Apr 15, 2017, at 9:46 PM, Josh wrote: > Hello, > > Does the current Asterisk 13 version of Astlinux support the Opus codec? No, Digium's Opus binary blob is not included, but the SILK CODEC is included. Here is a related mailing-list thread

[Astlinux-users] Opus Codec Support

Hello, Does the current Asterisk 13 version of Astlinux support the Opus codec? Also, I'm currently running astlinux-1.2.8 i686 - Asterisk 11.23.1. If I want to upgrade to version 13, can I just change my repository URL and do a regular upgrade through the web GUI? Thanks, Josh