Yes that could be used too although it would require lots more testing.
Regards
Michael Knill
From: Michael Keuter
Reply-To: AstLinux List
Date: Monday, 2 July 2018 at 8:51 am
To: AstLinux List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Using WAN Failover for Astlinux High Availability
Am 02.07.2018 um
> Am 02.07.2018 um 00:12 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> Hi Michael
>
> Sorry I probably shouldn't have called it HA as that is more as you
> described. Maybe it would be better calling it System Failover instead.
> Keeping them in sync should be pretty easy and I can just exclude files that
>
Hi Michael
Sorry I probably shouldn't have called it HA as that is more as you described.
Maybe it would be better calling it System Failover instead.
Keeping them in sync should be pretty easy and I can just exclude files that
are different. I would make the failover time fairly long so it only
> Am 01.07.2018 um 01:42 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> Hi Group
>
> Tell me if I am totally off track but I have been wondering for a while how I
> can do Astlinux HA e.g. having a primary and standby box
> So what do you need for this:
> • Monitoring of the primary Astlinux server
>
Hi Group
Tell me if I am totally off track but I have been wondering for a while how I
can do Astlinux HA e.g. having a primary and standby box
So what do you need for this:
1. Monitoring of the primary Astlinux server
2. Run a script if connectivity lost
3. Some sort of timers to preve
