Re: [Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
I figured I'd throw it out here for initial feedback on the theory that it'd be higher signal to noise, and then proceed to python-ideas if the async aficionados seemed generally in favor. On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I'd like input from others, but maybe it's worth e

Re: [Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Amber "Hawkie" Brown wrote: > >> On 9 Oct. 2016, at 14:50, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>> I've heard people call it an "async def" too. >>> >>> I don't think it's quite as dramatic as you worry about. Peopl

Re: [Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Amber "Hawkie" Brown
> On 9 Oct. 2016, at 14:50, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> I've heard people call it an "async def" too. >> >> I don't think it's quite as dramatic as you worry about. People also >> talk about generators (not generator functions) and even

Re: [Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
I'd like input from others, but maybe it's worth expanding the scope to python-ideas? Not too many people read async-sig. (Or should that be coroutine-sig? :-) On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> I've heard people ca

Re: [Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I've heard people call it an "async def" too. > > I don't think it's quite as dramatic as you worry about. People also > talk about generators (not generator functions) and even though > there's a further ambiguity between the function and

Re: [Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
I've heard people call it an "async def" too. I don't think it's quite as dramatic as you worry about. People also talk about generators (not generator functions) and even though there's a further ambiguity between the function and the type of object it returns, we still get along. There's also t

[Async-sig] A modest terminological proposal

2016-10-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
I've found that when talking about async/await stuff recently, I've mostly dropped the word "coroutine" from my vocabulary and replaced it with "async function". I'm writing to suggest that we might want to make this switch as a community, and do it now, before the next 10x increase in the async/aw