Re: [Async-sig] new library: sniffio – Sniff out which async library your code is running under

2018-08-18 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2018, 01:22 Chris Jerdonek wrote: >> >> Also, just to be clear, I think the idea of a library to sniff this >> information is great. >> >> It's just the location of where this information is being stored that >> I'm focusin

Re: [Async-sig] new library: sniffio – Sniff out which async library your code is running under

2018-08-18 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018, 01:22 Chris Jerdonek wrote: > Also, just to be clear, I think the idea of a library to sniff this > information is great. > > It's just the location of where this information is being stored that > I'm focusing in on and asking about. It seems like it should be in a > "neutr

Re: [Async-sig] new library: sniffio – Sniff out which async library your code is running under

2018-08-18 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Also, just to be clear, I think the idea of a library to sniff this information is great. It's just the location of where this information is being stored that I'm focusing in on and asking about. It seems like it should be in a "neutral" location, and in particular different from / decoupled from

Re: [Async-sig] new library: sniffio – Sniff out which async library your code is running under

2018-08-18 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Chris Jerdonek > wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:12 Chris Jerdonek wrote: Did you also think about whether it would be possible

Re: [Async-sig] new library: sniffio – Sniff out which async library your code is running under

2018-08-18 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:12 Chris Jerdonek wrote: >>> >>> Did you also think about whether it would be possible for a library to >>> advertise itself without having to depend on