QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-01-09 Thread Phyu The
Dear Sir, I tested performance throughput test used WPQ864 + QCA9880 11ac 80MHz is 640Mbps that is very low since theoretical data rate is 1300Mbps. It should be at least 866Mbps. Could you please suggest me how to get better performance? thanks, Phyuthe _

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-01-09 Thread Phyu The
Dear Sir, WPQ864 refer to IPQ8064 using LEDE firmware with ath10k driver. If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. thanks, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Phyu The Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 2:19 PM To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-01-12 Thread Phyu The
, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Ben Greear Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:59 AM To: Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance We have not done a lot of testing in AP mode, but when using 9880 3x3 compex NICs in our 2U rackmounts (high

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-01-12 Thread Sebastian Gottschall
- From: Ben Greear Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:59 AM To: Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance We have not done a lot of testing in AP mode, but when using 9880 3x3 compex NICs in our 2U rackmounts (high end Intel E5 processors), and with CT

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-01-20 Thread Ben Greear
ggest what may cause low throughput? thanks, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Ben Greear Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:59 AM To: Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance We have not done a lot of testing in AP mode, but when using 9880

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-09 Thread Phyu The
: Sebastian Gottschall ; Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance Hello! We ran some more tests using our x86 based platforms with 9880 NICs and 9984 NICs acting as both AP and Station. This is in an isolation chamber, wired up with SMA cables and variable

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-10 Thread Ben Greear
lated problem on WPQ864? thanks, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Ben Greear Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:24 AM To: Sebastian Gottschall ; Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance Hello! We ran some more tests using our x86 based platforms with

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-12 Thread Phyu The
; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance I don't know. I would first suggest that you try an x86 platform with powerful CPU in your own test environment. Possibly we are just using a better isolation chamber or have some other advantage in our environme

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-12 Thread Ben Greear
suggestion? thanks, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Ben Greear Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 12:14 AM To: Phyu The ; Sebastian Gottschall ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance I don't know. I would first suggest that you try an x86 platform

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-12 Thread Phyu The
: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance I would try to narrow down where the performance issue happens. So, for instance, could you run the exact same ath10k firmware (and board.bin, etc) that you are using in LEDE with the QCA driver? That would determine if it is firmware related or not. Can you

Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance

2017-02-13 Thread Ben Greear
suggestion? thanks, Phyuthe -Original Message- From: Ben Greear Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 12:14 AM To: Phyu The ; Sebastian Gottschall ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance I don't know. I would first suggest that you try an x86 pla