Dear Sir,
I tested performance throughput test used WPQ864 + QCA9880 11ac 80MHz is
640Mbps that is very low since theoretical data rate is 1300Mbps. It should
be at least 866Mbps. Could you please suggest me how to get better
performance?
thanks,
Phyuthe
_
Dear Sir,
WPQ864 refer to IPQ8064 using LEDE firmware with ath10k driver. If you have
any questions, please feel free to let me know.
thanks,
Phyuthe
-Original Message-
From: Phyu The
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 2:19 PM
To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz
,
Phyuthe
-Original Message-
From: Ben Greear
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:59 AM
To: Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
We have not done a lot of testing in AP mode, but when using 9880 3x3 compex
NICs
in our 2U rackmounts (high
- From: Ben Greear
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:59 AM
To: Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
We have not done a lot of testing in AP mode, but when using 9880 3x3
compex NICs
in our 2U rackmounts (high end Intel E5 processors), and with CT
ggest what may cause low throughput?
thanks,
Phyuthe
-Original Message- From: Ben Greear
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:59 AM
To: Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
We have not done a lot of testing in AP mode, but when using 9880
: Sebastian Gottschall ; Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
Hello!
We ran some more tests using our x86 based platforms with 9880 NICs and 9984
NICs
acting as both AP and Station. This is in an isolation chamber, wired up
with SMA cables
and variable
lated problem
on WPQ864?
thanks,
Phyuthe
-Original Message- From: Ben Greear
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:24 AM
To: Sebastian Gottschall ; Phyu The ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
Hello!
We ran some more tests using our x86 based platforms with
; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
I don't know. I would first suggest that you try an x86 platform with
powerful CPU in your own test environment. Possibly we are just using
a better isolation chamber or have some other advantage in our environme
suggestion?
thanks,
Phyuthe
-Original Message- From: Ben Greear
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 12:14 AM
To: Phyu The ; Sebastian Gottschall ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
I don't know. I would first suggest that you try an x86 platform
: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
I would try to narrow down where the performance issue happens.
So, for instance, could you run the exact same ath10k firmware (and
board.bin, etc) that you are using
in LEDE with the QCA driver? That would determine if it is firmware related
or not.
Can you
suggestion?
thanks,
Phyuthe
-Original Message- From: Ben Greear
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 12:14 AM
To: Phyu The ; Sebastian Gottschall ; ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA9880 3x3 80Mhz low performance
I don't know. I would first suggest that you try an x86 pla
11 matches
Mail list logo