Hi,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:53 AM Rakesh Pillai wrote:
>
> Currently the NAPI processing loops through all
> the copy engines and processes a particular copy
> engine is the copy completion is set for that copy
> engine. The host driver is not supposed to access
> any copy engine register afte
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:37 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:53 AM Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> >
> > Currently the NAPI processing loops through all
> > the copy engines and processes a particular copy
> > engine is the copy completion is set for that copy
> > engin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:49 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> I should also note that, while I'm not terribly familiar with Kalle's
> workflow, I would have expected to see him in the "To:" list. I've
> added him, but it's possible he'll need you to repost the patch with
> him in the "To:" list.
https:
Brian Norris writes:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:49 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
>> I should also note that, while I'm not terribly familiar with Kalle's
>> workflow, I would have expected to see him in the "To:" list. I've
>> added him, but it's possible he'll need you to repost the patch with
>> h
I'm getting this panic on IPQ4019 system after cherry-picked this
single patch on top of working system.
[ 14.226184] ath10k_ahb a00.wifi: failed to receive initialized
event from target: 8000
[ 14.326406] !#%&PageFault P
L F<005> [0008]
[ 14.326447] Unable to handle kernel NULL
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:33 PM Peter Oh wrote:
>
> I'm getting this panic on IPQ4019 system after cherry-picked this
> single patch on top of working system.
>
> [ 14.226184] ath10k_ahb a00.wifi: failed to receive initialized
> event from target: 8000
A bit of a shot in the dark,
I've run 3 units and one of them happens the problem always while the
other 2 are barely happening.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:33 PM Peter Oh wrote:
>
> I'm getting this panic on IPQ4019 system after cherry-picked this
> single patch on top of working system.
>
> [ 14.226184] ath10k_ahb a00.
Since IPQ4019 doesn't support per CE based interrupt summary, I doubt
if this change is correct.
+ ath10k_ce_engine_int_status_clear(ar, ctrl_addr,
+ wm_regs->cc_mask | wm_regs->wm_mask);
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:53 PM Peter Oh wrote:
>
> At first I
My previous email wasn't sent out.
At first I gave these 3 patches.
ath10k: Add interrupt summary based CE processing
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11628299/
ath10k: Keep track of which interrupts fired, don't poll them
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11654631/
ath10k: Get rid of "
I'll take my word back.
It's not this patch problem, but by others.
I have 2 extra patches before the 3 patches so my system looks like
backports from ath.git 5.6-rc1 + linux kernel 4.4 (similar to OpenWrt)
On top of the working system, I cherry-picked these 5.
#1.
ath10k: Avoid override CE5 conf
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Oh
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 7:03 AM
> To: Kalle Valo
> Cc: Brian Norris ; Doug Anderson
> ; linux-wireless wirel...@vger.kernel.org>; Rakesh Pillai ; ath10k
> ; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add interrupt
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:32 PM Peter Oh wrote:
>
> I'll take my word back.
> It's not this patch problem, but by others.
> I have 2 extra patches before the 3 patches so my system looks like
>
> backports from ath.git 5.6-rc1 + linux kernel 4.4 (similar to OpenWrt)
> On top of the working sy
t; ; linux-wireless > wirel...@vger.kernel.org>; Rakesh Pillai ; ath10k
>> ; LKML
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add interrupt summary based CE processing
>>
>> I'll take my word back.
>> It's not this patch problem, but by others.
>> I have
day, July 21, 2020 7:03 AM
> >> To: Kalle Valo
> >> Cc: Brian Norris ; Doug Anderson
> >> ; linux-wireless >> wirel...@vger.kernel.org>; Rakesh Pillai ; ath10k
> >> ; LKML
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add interrupt summary based CE proc
Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> Currently the NAPI processing loops through all
> the copy engines and processes a particular copy
> engine is the copy completion is set for that copy
> engine. The host driver is not supposed to access
> any copy engine register after clearing the interrupt
> status regis
15 matches
Mail list logo