* We call reset too often and this can result various PHY problems.
On config_interface we don't need to reset the whole device.
TODO: Create a function hw_fast_reset that only resets the PCU
(tx/rx stuff) and not the whole device so that we can use this for
stuck beacons etc.
Signed-o
* Don't enable BMISS interrupts as we don't handle them yet
Signed-off-by: Nick Kossifidis
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c
index 697450d..685c19c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c
@@ -2196,
* Update reset and sync with HALs
* Clean up eeprom settings and tweaking of initvals and
put them on separate functions
* Set/Restore 32KHz ref clk operation
* Add some more documentation
TODO: Spur mitigation, tpc, half/quarter rate, compression etc
v2: Address comments from Bob and
* Use the new way to modify rf buffer and put some rf buffer
documentation on rfbufer.h
* Merge all rf regs functions to one
* Sync with legacy HAL and Sam's HAL
* Set gain_F settings so that gain_F optimization engine works
on RF5111/RF5112 (note that both HALs only use step 0 for RF5
* Update and cleanup rf gain optimization code
* Add comments and refferences to docs and use sane function names
* Use only step index on ath5k_gain, no need to have a pointer to
the current step since we can determine te step from it's index,
this also allows us to put all other st
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:44:46PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> Hmmm...well it is a little big, but I guess it is OK. Do you have
> an example of the stack trace? Or a link to a bugzilla or somesuch
> would be even better...
Here's an oops I captured by forcing an skb alloc to fail (transcri
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 06:13:55PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2009/2/7 Bob Copeland :
> > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 07:20:52AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> >> O.K. do you want me to put these fixes on this patch or post a separate ?
> >
> > I think a separate patch is fine, it's a valid chang
2009/2/8 John W. Linville :
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 06:13:55PM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>> 2009/2/7 Bob Copeland :
>> > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 07:20:52AM +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>> >> O.K. do you want me to put these fixes on this patch or post a separate ?
>> >
>> > I think a separat