Hi,
i am checking the progress with AP mode in kernel from time to time and
recently there was big hooray on mailing lists how this was finally
activated in 2.6.29, however when checking ath5k/base.c in 2.6.29.1 i still
see BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) still missing in interface_modes. Would anybody
be
Should these work?
Linux lappy 2.6.29-gentoo-b0r3d #7 SMP Wed Apr 8 23:29:49 EDT 2009 i686
Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
0b:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212
802.11abg NIC [168c:1014] (rev 01)
Subsystem: IBM ThinkPad 11a/b/g W
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>> 2009/4/13 Luis R. Rodriguez :
>>>
>>> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
>>> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir m
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Luis R. Rodriguez :
>>
>> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
>> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir move
>> itself. Would you guys mind sending rebased ontop of the d
2009/4/13 Luis R. Rodriguez :
>
> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir move
> itself. Would you guys mind sending rebased ontop of the dir move?
When will the move happen on w-t ? I t 'll be much ea
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:09:16AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kossifidis
>> wrote:
>> > 2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
>>
>> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
>>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:09:16AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > 2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
>
> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir m
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
>> Here are a few random patches I have sitting in my local tree, currently
>> based before the ath5k/9k merge. The last one comes from a perl
>> script I wrote to check the initvals (also wrote one to check rfgai
