Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 22:08:57 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
> From: Tobias Doerffel
>
> I found these patches on the web not being merged since Jan. Was
> there any reason why they shouldn't be accepted?
Yes - they needed further work. The approach was wrong because the GPIO does
not control the
From: Tobias Doerffel
From: Tobias Doerffel
Add support for a radio led on devices with subvendor 0x144f.
That means don't register rx and tx leds for this particular device.
Add a flag for that into driver_data.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Doerffel
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby [rebase]
---
drivers
From: Tobias Doerffel
I found these patches on the web not being merged since Jan. Was
there any reason why they shouldn't be accepted?
As there were no replies to this version of them, I'm resending
them for review and comments :). I rebased them and moved to the
current approach in the led file
From: Jiri Slaby
We need to use driver_data for more than pin and polaroty data.
Remove driver_data designator from ATH_LED definition and write
it explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/led.c | 33 +
1 files changed, 21 inser
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Tobias Doerffel
wrote:
> Should be rebased against wireless-testing branch (with the changed directory
> structure), right?
That would be ideal (if it still applies somewhat cleanly, you can just
edit the patch paths directly).
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland
On 05/20/2009 10:16 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 22:08:57 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
>> From: Tobias Doerffel
>>
>> I found these patches on the web not being merged since Jan. Was
>> there any reason why they shouldn't be accepted?
> Yes - they needed further work. The
Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 22:29:42 schrieb Bob Copeland:
> On Wed, 20 May 2009 22:16:42 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote
>
> > If there's interest, I'll prepare a new patch which represents the
> > current state.
>
> I'm definitely interested in seeing rfkill gpio support getting in,
> it's overdue.
On Wed, 20 May 2009 22:16:42 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote
> If there's interest, I'll prepare a new patch which represents the
> current state.
I'm definitely interested in seeing rfkill gpio support getting in,
it's overdue. So I say repost it and we can fasttrack that. Digging
up your last pa
Dear Bob,
Another patch of ath5k FYI.
Sincerely,
Forrest
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Copeland"
To:
Cc: "Nick Kossifidis" ;
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:46 PM
Subject: RFC phy timing register bug
> Hi all,
>
> Someone pointed out to me a change in the code with the reset rewor
