On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:49 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:16:54PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Florian Engelhardt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:08 -0800, "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:42 A
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:16:54PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Florian Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:08 -0800, "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bob Copeland
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok, fair enough. We sh
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Florian Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:08 -0800, "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bob Copeland
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, fair enough. We should try to figure out where the 0x5d and 0x43
>>> come from. It could be memory
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:08 -0800, "Luis R. Rodriguez"
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bob Copeland
wrote:
>>
>> Ok, fair enough. We should try to figure out where the 0x5d and 0x43
>> come from. It could be memory corruption, for example, but 0x5d and
>> 0x43 aren't poison values.
This patch is whitespace-damaged, you don't have your email address
in the Signed-off-by or From lines (the latter being unnecessary
anyway), and even after I took the time to fix those issues it still
didn't apply.
Feel free to try again...thanks.
JOhn
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:07:28PM +0200,
look in net/mac80211/tx.c
function ieee80211_subif_start_xmit
Hope this helps
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, ath5k-devel-requ...@lists.ath5k.org
wrote:
> From: ath5k-devel-requ...@lists.ath5k.org
>
> Subject: ath5k-devel Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3
> To: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
> Date: Friday, Decem
