[ath5k-devel] [PATCH/RFC] ath5k: dont use external sleep clock in AP mode

2009-12-22 Thread Bob Copeland
See the bugzilla reference below. Any objections? I can't imagine that an AP would want to use the low resolution clock since they aren't supposed to sleep anyway - and the HAL does something similar... When using the external sleep clock in AP mode, the TSF increments too quickly, causing beac

Re: [ath5k-devel] 2.6.32.1: soft lockup in ath5k_hw_register_timeout

2009-12-22 Thread Bob Copeland
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Thiemo Nagel wrote: > One more thing:  I'd like to emphasize that I had system freezes also hours > after loading the ath5k module.  Any idea whether that can be explained by > the same bug? Well it doesn't necessarily have to happen right after modprobe - any cal

Re: [ath5k-devel] 2.6.32.1: soft lockup in ath5k_hw_register_timeout

2009-12-22 Thread Thiemo Nagel
Bob Copeland wrote: >> - ath5k_hw_register_timeout() - which can spin for 1/3s (or more if >> udelay is broken) > > Just one other thought - maybe udelay _is_ broken. You may try > without using the HPET (CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=n). I had another softlockup approx 2s after executing rmmod ath5k; mo

Re: [ath5k-devel] [ath5k-users] Using ath5k as an Access Point with a 2.6.31.5 kernel

2009-12-22 Thread Göran Uddeborg
> I should probably also switch to the packaging of hostapd John > W. Linville is preparing for Fedora > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180). Just in case I > have made some kind of mistake in building it. That helped! I've no idea what was wrong with my build of hostapd, but up

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: Reimplement clock rate to usec conversion

2009-12-22 Thread Lukáš Turek
On 22.12.2009 02:24 海藻敬之 wrote: > Does original Atheros HAL calls the function just for 5GHz > or calls for both 2GHz and 5 GHz.? For both, too, the condition used is IS_CHAN_OFDM(chan). > --- reset.c_org 2009-12-17 17:01:29.0 +0900 > +++ reset.c 2009-12-22 09:51:16.0 +0900 > @@ -6