Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH v2 13/20] cfg80211: Add nl80211 antenna configuration

2010-05-21 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2010-05-21 7:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:59:33PM -0700, Bruno Randolf wrote: >>> so from my point of view this is not very different from what we can support >>> with the API i suggested. for RX it seems

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH v2 13/20] cfg80211: Add nl80211 antenna configuration

2010-05-21 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2010-05-21 7:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:59:33PM -0700, Bruno Randolf wrote: >> so from my point of view this is not very different from what we can support >> with the API i suggested. for RX it seems to be 100% equivalent. > > Well I agree, the API *supports

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH v2 13/20] cfg80211: Add nl80211 antenna configuration

2010-05-21 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:59:33PM -0700, Bruno Randolf wrote: > On Friday 21 May 2010 07:05:48 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > For legacy, keep it simple, use 3 settings, fixed_a, fixed_b, > > diversity, for all devices. > > did you not understand my examples why i think it makes sense to use a > b