Hi,
Can someone kindly explain to me the meaning to the following interrupts found
in ATH5K?
1) AR5K_INT_TXEOL
2) AR5K_INT_TXDESC
Whenever I send a packet, TXEOL will be raised shortly after transmission, is
this interrupt an indication of completion of transmission i.e. last bit of
packet ha
Le 30/06/2010 05:44, Jono a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I'm looking for
> information on a specific register on Atheros cards.
>
> I've been told that there is a register that Atheros chips update with
> information about how much of a set period has been d
Hi,
I am using atth5k/9k driver extensively for my project work. Currently I
run it on the 32-bit Lucid Lynx OS on a 32-bit Intel processor. Im
thinking of purchasing a new computer and the newer processors these
days are all 64 bits. I was wondering if anyone has experienced any
problems inst
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I'm looking for
information on a specific register on Atheros cards.
I've been told that there is a register that Atheros chips update with
information about how much of a set period has been detected as 'CCA'
time. Unfortunately, I cannot f
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this, but I'm looking for
information on a specific register on Atheros cards.
I've been told that there is a register that Atheros chips update with
information about how much of a set period has been detected as 'CCA' time.
Unfortunately, I can
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Tue June 29 2010 00:56:48 you wrote:
> > Today, i found that there would be only 1000 RXOK interrupt occured,
> that's
> > why only 1000 packets received. I suspected that it 's because the
> latency
> > of VxWorks jobQueue is much more t
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:08 -0400, Aditya Bhave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using atth5k/9k driver extensively for my project work. Currently I
> run it on the 32-bit Lucid Lynx OS on a 32-bit Intel processor. Im
> thinking of purchasing a new computer and the newer processors these
> days are all 64
I'm using mine on a 64 bit host. There have been some issues, but
nothing that I would guess has anything to do with the 64-bit:ness.
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
Hello Benoit,
Regarding the Half/Quarter channel support in madwifi-free; does it
also implement possible changes in the center frequency ?
Is that possible to select different center frequencies? e.g. for
quarter channels in 802.11a use channels 37, 38 and 39, ...
If not, what sho
On 06/28/2010 12:17 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote:
> Le 25/06/2010 22:08, Steve Brown a écrit :
>>
>> I see that there are some TO DO comments in the ath5k code for
>> half/quarter channels. Is this being worked on?
>>
>> If not and somebody on the list has the needed info and would be willing
>> to
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Jin YunYe wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply, Bob.
>>
>> My problem is not exactly compatibility of hardware. Instead, I want
>> the driver to send out the response as soon as it receives a packet
>> (when notifi
11 matches
Mail list logo