On Tue December 7 2010 23:01:21 John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:08:12AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > One thing I missed in my WME series: Older hardware does not have enough
> > hardware queues to support WME. In this case we just set up one data
> > queue. Use the capabilit
On Tue December 7 2010 22:18:20 Neo Tida wrote:
> I have a problem with ath5k. I can't get more than 14 Mbps with ath5k, but
> with madwifi and exactly that platform, I can get about 40 Mbps. For more
> info, I use openwrt(trunk) on two routerstation pro platform with ar5414
> based mini pci card
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> This patch fixes an issue in wirless-next-2.6 / linux-next
> (next-20101207) with ath5k and wrong modinfo output.
>
> - Sedat -
>
Argh, new attempt... Missing "Signed-off-by: ...".
- Sedat -
From c32080635a52549692e
This patch fixes an issue in wirless-next-2.6 / linux-next
(next-20101207) with ath5k and wrong modinfo output.
- Sedat -
From 394c3ca4fdc0e8e92d8117c1da2efdc917362c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sedat Dilek
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:35:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ath5k: Fix modinfo does not
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat D
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:05:28AM -0800, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:12:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > ath_print is misleading as it's only used with CONFIG_ATH_DEBUG.
> >
> > Add and use the more normal _printk and _
> > printk equivalents. (ath_printk and ath_)
> >
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:12:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> ath_print is misleading as it's only used with CONFIG_ATH_DEBUG.
>
> Add and use the more normal _printk and _
> printk equivalents. (ath_printk and ath_)
>
> Fix various defects in the current uses of ath_print formats
> and argument
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have already reported on linux-wirel
fig file, as you say I have not CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR231X
>> set and that's why AHB support is not selected/built, instead
>>
>> CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/pci.o
>>
>> is built.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I can't cleanly revert. Sorry, I can't help
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> >> I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after
> >> especially the merge of "AHB
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after
>> especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (see [2]) my ath5k
>> was not working as expected i
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after
> especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (see [2]) my ath5k
> was not working as expected in daily use (also modinfo).
>
> I am not sure if it is the dri
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:08:12AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> One thing I missed in my WME series: Older hardware does not have enough
> hardware queues to support WME. In this case we just set up one data queue.
> Use
> the capability information to decide how many queues to set up.
>
> Signe
Hi
I have a problem with ath5k. I can't get more than 14 Mbps with ath5k, but with
madwifi and exactly that platform, I can get about 40 Mbps. For more info, I
use openwrt(trunk) on two routerstation pro platform with ar5414 based mini pci
card in 11a mode.
As I can get a great performance wi
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just compiled linux-next (next-20101207) which also includes
> wireless-next-2.6 (master-2010-12-06) [1].
>
> I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after
> especially the merge of "
Hi,
I just compiled linux-next (next-20101207) which also includes
wireless-next-2.6 (master-2010-12-06) [1].
I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after
especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (see [2]) my ath5k
was not working as expected in daily
16 matches
Mail list logo
