.. and you'll be able to sense ACKs how? :-)
Adrian
On 29 February 2012 14:25, srinivas prasad wrote:
> I thought that it will enable me to transmit without sensing the carrier. I
> am a bit new to this so maybe I interpreted it wrong. My aim is to induce
> overlaps as many overlaps as possible
2012/2/29 srinivas prasad :
> Thanks for the reply. Just to make it clear, So are you saying that the
> patch is buggy? I thought it is supposed to disable carrier sensing
> (physical and virtual) by turning on and off some flags.
>
Define buggy. This patch disables carrier sensing on PHY by forc
I thought that it will enable me to transmit without sensing the carrier. I
am a bit new to this so maybe I interpreted it wrong. My aim is to induce
overlaps as many overlaps as possible in our network in our experiments. I
thought by physical carrier sense, i would be able to transmit without
sen
On 29 February 2012 09:19, srinivas prasad wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Just to make it clear, So are you saying that the
> patch is buggy? I thought it is supposed to disable carrier sensing
> (physical and virtual) by turning on and off some flags.
I don't think that patch does what you thin
Thanks for the reply. Just to make it clear, So are you saying that the
patch is buggy? I thought it is supposed to disable carrier sensing
(physical and virtual) by turning on and off some flags.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-02-28 3:01 AM, srinivas prasad wro
