Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend

2009-06-18 Thread Alan Stern
his should be doing more or less the same thing as if you removed the device while the system was running. Or is it not hot-unpluggable? Alan Stern ___ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend

2009-06-15 Thread Alan Stern
t; No, they shouldn't. > > That's why we do the entire suspend_device_irqs() thing etc. Looks like the Documentation/power/pci.txt file needs to be updated. No surprise, it hasn't been touched in well over a year and there haven&#

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend

2009-06-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I triggered a WARNING while hacking on eeepc-laptop's > >> rfkill-by-pci-hotplug. I saw "Tr

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend

2009-06-15 Thread Alan Stern
end method or that there's no check for already-freed in the remove method. My guess is the latter. Alan Stern ___ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel