[ath5k-devel] Connecting BlackBerry to hotspot

2011-05-11 Thread Martin Grossman
Just joined this list an hour ago ... The 2 packets you show are a PING REQUEST (TYPE=8) to your hotspot, and a PING REPLY (TYPE=0) from your hotspot! AND, they have the same ICMP ID # so the responce is from that request and not a previous one. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic

Re: [ath5k-devel] noise floor calibration timeout

2009-07-05 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-07-05 17:21, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:37:38PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > I have problems connecting my AP. Listing APs using 'iwlist > > scanning' does work, however. I assume that a lot of syslog > > messages "ath5k p

[ath5k-devel] noise floor calibration timeout

2009-07-05 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Hi, I have problems connecting my AP. Listing APs using 'iwlist scanning' does work, however. I assume that a lot of syslog messages "ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout (2412MHz)" are related to the problem. Any ideas how to solve the issue? According to lspci -v, my hardware is: 06:00.

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k: Support LED's on Acer Extensa 5620z

2009-03-24 Thread Martin Bammer
ASUSTek. > > Probably. > > > Do you have it's MAC address? > > No, but that's a good idea. > > Martin, would you mind posting the first three octets of your MAC > address for the atheros card so we can get the vendor name correct? > >

Re: [ath5k-devel] [Fwd: Re: Bug#510591: Module ath5k is not auto-loaded on boot]

2009-01-04 Thread Martin
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 19:37 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:43:44AM +0000, Martin wrote: > > Hi, > >I'm trying to sort out a problem with the ath5k module not loading on > > a ThinkPad T42. I'm using the current Debian testing kernel (

[ath5k-devel] [Fwd: Re: Bug#510591: Module ath5k is not auto-loaded on boot]

2009-01-04 Thread Martin
The Debian developer in charge of handling this suggested contacting you for more information. Can anyone make any suggestions? Thanks in advance for your time and for the great driver (once loaded it works fantastically). Cheers, - Martin Forwarded Message From: Moritz Muehl

Re: [ath5k-devel] [Bug 11749] Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle

2008-11-23 Thread Xu, Martin
Bob: You are right, the bss_infor_changed is lost on the way. Please review below patch: From: Martin Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: disable beacon filter when station is not associated with any AP. Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_b

Re: [ath5k-devel] [Bug 11749] Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle

2008-11-19 Thread Xu, Martin
Hi Bob: Please review below patch thanks. From: Martin Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: disable beacon filter when station is not associated with any AP. Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11749 Signed-off-by: Martin Xu &

Re: [ath5k-devel] [Bug 11749] Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle

2008-11-16 Thread Xu, Martin
Hi bob: Please review below patch which has been modified according to your comments. From: Martin Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: disable beacon filter when station is not associated with any AP. Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.

Re: [ath5k-devel] [Bug 11749] Ath5k driver has too many interrupts per second at idle

2008-11-12 Thread Xu, Martin
Hi all: I have a patch that can be used to fix the bug. The patch resolved the issue by disabling the beacon filter when disassociated with AP and enabling beacon when associate with AP. See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11749 Please review it. Thanks! diff --git a/drivers/net/wirele

Re: [ath5k-devel] ath5k: bad udelay call, build failure on ARM

2008-09-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
e are older > chips that need more delay). I'll do some tests asap and tweak this > value to be in range. Did you have a chance to do these tests yet? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ___ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Re: [ath5k-devel] ath5k: bad udelay call, build failure on ARM

2008-08-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
t; translate to __bad_udelay on arm. mdelay(3) compiles on ARM, so replacing the udelay(2300) with mdelay(3) might be an option. (I don't have the hardware to test though.) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ ___ ath5k-devel mailing li

[ath5k-devel] ath5k: bad udelay call, build failure on ARM

2008-08-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
27;re calling udelay() with an out of range value. * * With currently imposed limits, this means that we support a max delay * of 2000us. Further limits: HZ<=1000 and bogomips<=3355 */ extern void __bad_udelay(void); Can you check why your driver is calling udelay() with a value > 200