is only 6 files changed, 3
insertions(+), 294 deletions(-), while the series is 39 files changed,
3911 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-).
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
that depends on ATHEROS_AR231X. If that symbol
ever gets added to the tree the AHB bus support can be re-added too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
---
First sent in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/13/303 . Updated on top of
next-20140909.
Build tested only (no access to this hardware).
drivers
Jiri, Nick, Luis, John,
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could Jiri
e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be
submitted?
I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front
Hi Sergey,
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl:
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could Jiri
e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline
exist) and uses of struct ar231x_board_config (ditto). So it
won't build as is and therefor needs work to qualify for staging.
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
Jiri, Nick, Luis, John,
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 13:20 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
2014-04-15 21:08 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:14 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:50:30PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
John, can you delay
Hi Sergey,
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:10 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
2014-06-18 14:25 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl:
ATHEROS_AR231X and the things depending on it, like AHB bus support,
have been discussed for three years now. When will you (re)consider a
patch to remove all
to linux-mips.
OK -- looking forward to your patches.
So am I. Is there any news on this front?
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
as well as the symbol.
Just yesterday I once again raised this issue (see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/8/248 ). My patch - which dates form May
2013 - removes quite a bit more than Richard's patch.
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel
development cycle. We're now at
v3.14-rc1, and the patch still applies (perhaps requiring some trivial
context changes).
Should I resubmit?
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k
that depends on ATHEROS_AR231X. If that symbol
ever gets added to the tree the AHB bus support can be re-added too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
---
0) Compile tested (I do not think I have hardware that use the ath5k
driver).
1) I mentioned the missing ATHEROS_AR231X symbol three times
at v3.9-rc2 and nothing has changed since we first discussed
this issue, shortly after v3.1 was released. Would anyone object if Bob
or I redo Bob's (draft) cleanup patch on top of v3.9-rc2 and submit it?
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:16 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:41:53PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
0) Since commit a0b907ee (ath5k: Add AHB bus support) the mainline
kernel tree uses the Kconfig symbol ATHEROS_AR231X and the preprocessor
macro CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR231X.
1
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 02:51 +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
2012/4/20 Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl:
Well we also need the chip revision to make sense so we need the part
from dmesg where ath5k loads.
From the current session:
6[ 13.735187] ath5k :02:02.0: registered as 'phy0'
7
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
2012/4/20 Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl:
How frequently do they appear ?
At most once a day (with light usage: on this laptop I try to track
Fedora Rawhide, which means I use another machine to actually get things
done).
You do suspend
() is transformed to -EIO by ath5k_hw_nic_wakeup().
3) Do these message really indicate errors? Or can they perhaps be
downgraded to (say) KERN_INFO level (ie, 6 prefix)?
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https
CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR231X.)
2) Should a Kconfig entry for ATHEROS_AR231X be added (to
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/Kconfig)? Or should that Kconfig symbol
and that macro just be dropped?
Paul Bolle
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https
17 matches
Mail list logo
