Re: [ath5k-devel] [Resend][PATCH] Wireless / ath5k: Simplify suspend and resume callbacks

2009-11-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 23 November 2009, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:44:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Subject: Wireless / ath5k: Simplify suspend and resume callbacks > > > > Simplify the suspend and resume callbacks

[ath5k-devel] [Resend][PATCH] Wireless / ath5k: Simplify suspend and resume callbacks

2009-11-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Subject: Wireless / ath5k: Simplify suspend and resume callbacks Simplify the suspend and resume callbacks of ath5k by converting the driver to struct dev_pm_ops and allowing the PCI PM core to do the PCI-specific suspend/resume handling. Tested with Atheros

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] Wireless / ath5k: Simplify suspend and resume callbacks

2009-10-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 05 October 2009, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Simplify the suspend and resume callbacks of ath5k by converting the > > driver to struct dev_pm_ops and allowing the PC

[ath5k-devel] [PATCH] Wireless / ath5k: Simplify suspend and resume callbacks

2009-10-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Simplify the suspend and resume callbacks of ath5k by converting the driver to struct dev_pm_ops and allowing the PCI PM core to do the PCI-specific suspend/resume handling. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c | 35

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ath5k: do not release irq across suspend/resume

2009-07-04 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday 04 July 2009, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 07/04/2009 06:59 PM, Bob Copeland wrote: > > Paraphrasing Rafael J. Wysocki: "drivers should not release PCI IRQs > > in suspend." Doing so causes a warning during suspend/resume on some > > platforms. > > Hmm,

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend

2009-06-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 15 June 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > I'm not sure whether the example is trustworthy. There was some > > > discussion quite a while ago regarding whether drivers should free > > > their IRQs dur

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend

2009-06-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday 15 June 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > > Alan Stern wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I triggered a WARNING while hacking on eeepc-laptop's > > >> rfkill-by-pci-hotplug. I saw "Trying to

Re: [ath5k-devel] Bugs on aspire one A150

2008-12-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 13 of December 2008, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 14:35 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, 13 of December 2008, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > > > So, big thanks for everything. > > > > > > Now aspi

Re: [ath5k-devel] Bugs on aspire one A150

2008-12-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 13 of December 2008, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > So, big thanks for everything. > > Now aspire one linux support is very close to perfect, > (only problem left is that wireless is limited to 18Mbits/s raw rate, > but at some point I or developers of ath5k will get to the bottom of > th

Re: [ath5k-devel] [BUG] hang with ath5k

2008-10-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 16 of October 2008, Dave Young wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/14/2008 10:42 AM, Dave Young wrote: > >> 1) run wpa_supplicant > >> 2) ctrl + C > >> 3) goto 1) > > > > It doesn't happen here. How many iterations in average you n