Luis R. Rodriguez schreef op ma 13-05-2013 om 10:43 [-0700]:
> NACK, looking forward to the linux-mips patches, in the future however
> we want to avoid these type of placeholder patches.
This thread was (likely) started when I submitted this patch (to remove
AHB bus support) during the v3.10 deve
On 05/13/2013 11:11 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... is anyone using this on openwrt?
>
I am.
I am also reworking AR2131X drivers and will submit a patch to
linux-mips shortly.
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> On 13 May 2013 08:03, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> AHB bus support was added in v2.6.38, through commit a0b907
Hmm... i'm working right now to make ar231x device work with upstream
sources. First think is boot loader. There are is a ar231x fork of
redboot, but i decided to go barebox. See:
https://github.com/olerem/barebox/commits/atheros
there one more barebox dev on it, so i think we will get it.
Next s
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 13 May 2013 09:39, Jonathan Bither wrote:
>
>>> ... is anyone using this on openwrt?
>>>
>> I am.
>> I am also reworking AR2131X drivers and will submit a patch to linux-mips
>> shortly.
>
> Sweet. Someone say NACK then? :)
NACK, looking
On 13 May 2013 09:39, Jonathan Bither wrote:
>> ... is anyone using this on openwrt?
>>
> I am.
> I am also reworking AR2131X drivers and will submit a patch to linux-mips
> shortly.
Sweet. Someone say NACK then? :)
Adrian
___
ath5k-devel mailing li
AHB bus support was added in v2.6.38, through commit a0b907ee2a ("ath5k:
Add AHB bus support."). That code can only be build if the Kconfig
symbol ATHEROS_AR231X is set. But that symbol has never been added to
the tree. So AHB bus support has always been dead code.
Let's remove all code that depen
... is anyone using this on openwrt?
Adrian
On 13 May 2013 08:03, Paul Bolle wrote:
> AHB bus support was added in v2.6.38, through commit a0b907ee2a ("ath5k:
> Add AHB bus support."). That code can only be build if the Kconfig
> symbol ATHEROS_AR231X is set. But that symbol has never been ad
