On Friday 16 April 2010 22:59:07 Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:38:47 +0900
Bruno Randolf b...@einfach.org wrote:
There was a confusion in the usage of the bits AR5K_STA_ID1_ACKCTS_6MB
and AR5K_STA_ID1_BASE_RATE_11B. If they are set (1), we will get lower
bitrates for
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:38:47 +0900
Bruno Randolf b...@einfach.org wrote:
There was a confusion in the usage of the bits AR5K_STA_ID1_ACKCTS_6MB and
AR5K_STA_ID1_BASE_RATE_11B. If they are set (1), we will get lower bitrates
for
ACK and CTS. Therefore ath5k_hw_set_ack_bitrate_high(ah, false)
There was a confusion in the usage of the bits AR5K_STA_ID1_ACKCTS_6MB and
AR5K_STA_ID1_BASE_RATE_11B. If they are set (1), we will get lower bitrates for
ACK and CTS. Therefore ath5k_hw_set_ack_bitrate_high(ah, false) actually
resulted in high bitrates, which i think is what we want anyways.
