On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:37:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Someone recently asked on a mailing list (unfortunately I can't recall
> which one) if drivers should release irqs over suspend.
Yeah, it was linux-wireless. Original message is here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124515
On Saturday 04 July 2009, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 07/04/2009 06:59 PM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> > Paraphrasing Rafael J. Wysocki: "drivers should not release PCI IRQs
> > in suspend." Doing so causes a warning during suspend/resume on some
> > platforms.
>
> Hmm, I added it because I was told an irq
On 07/04/2009 06:59 PM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> Paraphrasing Rafael J. Wysocki: "drivers should not release PCI IRQs
> in suspend." Doing so causes a warning during suspend/resume on some
> platforms.
Hmm, I added it because I was told an irq can change over suspend (or at
least it could in the pas
Paraphrasing Rafael J. Wysocki: "drivers should not release PCI IRQs
in suspend." Doing so causes a warning during suspend/resume on some
platforms.
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
Reported-by: Alan Jenkins
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c | 11 ---
1 file
