Am Donnerstag 07 Oktober 2010 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 09:44 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
>
> > So, I guess it makes sense to just return the calculated channel
> > utilization value (u8)
> > and keep it up to date within the driver.
>
> Not good, that means drivers implementi
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 09:44 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> So, I guess it makes sense to just return the calculated channel
> utilization value (u8)
> and keep it up to date within the driver.
Not good, that means drivers implementing this will have to wake the CPU
to do calculations even if nobody
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> which units do you have for the busy time? what about other drivers?
> in ath[59]k we have it as cycles (which is about 1/44000 of a second,
> depending on the mode). so it counts up rather fast.
We've got the busy time in [us] since the last
@lists.ath5k.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org;
linvi...@tuxdriver.com; adr...@freebsd.org; vasa...@atheros.com
Betreff: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 4/5] nl80211/mac80211: Add channel
utilization to survey
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Sc
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Thu October 7 2010 15:51:49 Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>> > On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>> >> > This adds
On Thu October 7 2010 15:51:49 Helmut Schaa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Schaa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> >> > This adds three new values to the survey results:
> >> >
> >> > * BU
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>> > This adds three new values to the survey results:
>> >
>> > * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
>> > * BUSY_TX - p
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>> > This adds three new values to the survey results:
>> >
>> > * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
>> > * BUSY_TX - p
On Wed October 6 2010 18:54:37 Helmut Schaa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > This adds three new values to the survey results:
> >
> > * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
> > * BUSY_TX - percentage of time spent transmitting frames
> > * BUSY_RX -
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> This adds three new values to the survey results:
>
> * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
> * BUSY_TX - percentage of time spent transmitting frames
> * BUSY_RX - percentage of time spent receiving frames
Does BUSY include BU
On Wed October 6 2010 07:36:30 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > This adds three new values to the survey results:
> >
> > * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
> > * BUSY_TX - percentage of time spent transmitting frames
> > * BUSY_
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> This adds three new values to the survey results:
>
> * BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
> * BUSY_TX - percentage of time spent transmitting frames
> * BUSY_RX - percentage of time spent receiving frames
>
> They are defined t
This adds three new values to the survey results:
* BUSY - percentage of time the channel was busy
* BUSY_TX - percentage of time spent transmitting frames
* BUSY_RX - percentage of time spent receiving frames
They are defined to be a percentage of time, normalized to 255. That way they
mat
13 matches
Mail list logo
