Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, John W. Linville > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville >>> wrote: >>> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat D

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > >> >> I have already reported on linux-wirel

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > >> >> I have already reported on linux-wirel

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > >> I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after > >> especially the merge of "AHB

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after >> especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (see [2]) my ath5k >> was not working as expected i

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after > especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (see [2]) my ath5k > was not working as expected in daily use (also modinfo). > > I am not sure if it is the dri

Re: [ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I just compiled linux-next (next-20101207) which also includes > wireless-next-2.6 (master-2010-12-06) [1]. > > I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after > especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (s

[ath5k-devel] [linux-next] next-20101207: Better now, but modinfo ath5k

2010-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I just compiled linux-next (next-20101207) which also includes wireless-next-2.6 (master-2010-12-06) [1]. I have already reported on linux-wireless (short: l-w) ML that after especially the merge of "AHB Bus support" patchset (see [2]) my ath5k was not working as expected in daily use (also m