Hi Holger,
 
Thanks for the reply.
I would like to test the Neighbour AP concept in 802.11k and I have the support 
in client i.e. custom supplicant and would like to have an AP(As I have an 
Atheros card) with 802.11k for testing. If  support for 802.11k is available, 
then  Iam  unable to get any details to enable/disable this feature in 
Ath5k.That' the reason I sent a mail to the group so as to understand this.
 
 
Regards,
Vinod
 

________________________________
 From: "ath5k-devel-requ...@lists.ath5k.org" 
<ath5k-devel-requ...@lists.ath5k.org>
To: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org 
Sent: Saturday, 6 July 2013 3:30 PM
Subject: ath5k-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2
  

Send ath5k-devel mailing list submissions to
    ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    ath5k-devel-requ...@lists.ath5k.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    ath5k-devel-ow...@lists.ath5k.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ath5k-devel digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: 802.11k (Holger Schurig)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:49:45 +0200
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschu...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] 802.11k
To: vinod lr <vinod...@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: "ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" <ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org>
Message-ID:
    <caopc7mghovpeg9xbwi_s6nddp8xk7rwrh0rssfcyev4bgy8...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

No. And yes. That would be a layer violation. The question is like
asking "Will Goodmonths tires support driving to Paris?". The answer
is: the tires don't care. They are there to rotate.

Similarly, ath5k doesn't care. It's there to change frequency,
transmit and receive packets.


802.11k would happen in different places. E.g the part where the
hostapd informs the client happens in hostapd. The part where the
client now scans could happen in wpa_supplicant, maybe with a bit help
of mac80211 (in Linux kernel), maybe not.

Question: isn't 802.11k a corner case?  Do you REALLY have problems
that a swarm of x clients just attach to one access point?

Wouldn't the easier solution be to just increase the AP density and
reduce the tranmit power of the APs a bit?  APs are cheap nowadays ...


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel


End of ath5k-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2
******************************************
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to