Luis,
>
> wireless-testing is now on 2.6.28-rc7, please do a git pull and
> recompile and test that. It has some critical fixes for ath9k.
>
Downloaded and installed, I had done a git-pull a few hours before and
it was not there:)
I set up my system with NX running and was waiting to be up 2ho
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:59:21PM -0800, Brian wrote:
> Luis,
> I tried to respond to your comment in bug 12110 but do not have a id yet.
>
> Does this patch fix this bug?
>
>
> Here is my response
>
>
> I have the same problem but with wireless testing on a 2.6.28-rc6-wl kernel.
> I can run
Luis,
I tried to respond to your comment in bug 12110 but do not have a id yet.
Does this patch fix this bug?
Here is my response
I have the same problem but with wireless testing on a 2.6.28-rc6-wl kernel.
I can run for hours if I do not use the wireless heavily.
But will crash within 10mins
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:22 PM, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:24:04PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I don'
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:24:04PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't see this patch upstream in Linus's tree. Am I just missing it
> > > and if so,
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
commit b4b6cda2298b0c9a0af902312184b775b8867c65 upstream
We should only tell the hardware its capable of DMA'ing
to us only what we asked dev_alloc_skb().
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
commit ca0c7e5101fd4f37fed8e851709f08580b92fbb3 upstream.
This should fix the SW-IOMMU bounce buffer starvation
seen ok kernel.org bugzilla 11811:
http:/
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:19:22PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > I do
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:20:32PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I don't see this patch upstream in Linus's tree. Am I just missing it
>> > and
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 01:27 -0800, David Shwatrz wrote:
> I think that I heard that it does support Access Point mode (AP), so
> my question is: what is the status of master mode (AP) in ath9k ? Is it
> known to work ? (I am willing to use also the driver for the wireless-testing
> or ath9k git t
Hello,
According to the linux wireless drivers page, ath9k does not support
Access Point (AP, Master Mode)
see: http://www.linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers
I think that I heard that it does support Access Point mode (AP), so
my question is: what is the status of master mode (AP) in ath9k ? Is
11 matches
Mail list logo
