Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 16/21] mac80211: add helper for management / no-ack frame rate decision

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:33 PM, reinette chatre wrote: > Hi Luis, > > On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:14 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> All current rate control algorithms agree to send management and no-ack >> frames at the lowest rate. They also agree to do this when sta >> and the private rate con

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 16/21] mac80211: add helper for management / no-ack frame rate decision

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
All current rate control algorithms agree to send management and no-ack frames at the lowest rate. They also agree to do this when sta and the private rate control data is NULL. We add a hlper to mac80211 for this and simplify the rate control algorithm code. Developers wishing to make enhancement

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v4 01/21] mac80211: drop frames for sta with no valid rate

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
When we're associated we should be able to send data to target sta. If we cannot we may be trying to use the incorrect band to talk to the sta. Lets catch any such cases, warn, and drop the frames to not invalidate assumptions being made on rate control algorithms when they have a valid sta to comm

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2] ath9k: Tune ANI function processing on AP mode during ANI reset

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
For AP mode we must tune ANI specially for 2 GHz and for 5 GHz. We mask in only the flags we want to toggle on ath9k_hw_ani_control() through the ah->ani_function bitmask, this will take care of ignoring changes during ANI reset which we were disabling before. Testedy-by: Steven Luo Cc: Bennyam M

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 16/21] mac80211: add helper for management / no-ack frame rate decision

2009-07-16 Thread reinette chatre
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 10:05 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > All current rate control algorithms agree to send management and no-ack > frames at the lowest rate. They also agree to do this when sta > and the private rate control data is NULL. We add a hlper to mac80211 > for this and simplify the

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 16/21] mac80211: add helper for management / no-ack frame rate decision

2009-07-16 Thread Gábor Stefanik
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > All current rate control algorithms agree to send management and no-ack > frames at the lowest rate. They also agree to do this when sta > and the private rate control data is NULL. We add a hlper to mac80211 > for this and simplify the ra

[ath9k-devel] Newbie: Where/How does ath9k registers cfg80211_ops callbacks?

2009-07-16 Thread Rakesh Kumar
Hello, I was browsing through the ath9k code and was wondering where does it register the callback functions which are given in *cfg80211.h*, where it says: * * struct cfg80211_ops - backend description for wireless configuration * * This struct is registered by fullmac card drivers and/or wire

Re: [ath9k-devel] Newbie: Where/How does ath9k registers cfg80211_ops callbacks?

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:56:31PM -0700, Rakesh Kumar wrote: > Hello, > > I was browsing through the ath9k code and was wondering where does it > register the callback functions which are given in cfg80211.h, where it says: > > * struct cfg80211_ops - backend description for wireless configura

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath: add support for special 0x8000 regulatory domain

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Two users of ar9170 devices have now reported their cards have been programmed with a regulatory domain of 0x8000. This is not a valid regulatory domain as such these users were unable to use these devices. Since this doesn't seem to be a device EEPROM corruption we must treat it specially. We def

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 16/21] mac80211: add helper for management / no-ack frame rate decision

2009-07-16 Thread Felix Fietkau
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > All current rate control algorithms agree to send management and no-ack > frames at the lowest rate. They also agree to do this when sta > and the private rate control data is NULL. We add a hlper to mac80211 > for this and simplify the rate control algorithm code. > > D

[ath9k-devel] r52n - ar9220 miniPCi 11n

2009-07-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It should have our ar9280 MAC. http://www.mikrotik-shop.de/product_info.php?info=p513_MikroTik-RouterBoard-R52N.html Luis ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https:

Re: [ath9k-devel] r52n - ar9220 miniPCi 11n

2009-07-16 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 17:15 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It > should have our ar9280 MAC. > > http://www.mikrotik-shop.de/product_info.php?info=p513_MikroTik-RouterBoard-R52N.html Is there anything special about this card, or