On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 05:35:45AM -0700, Joerg Albert wrote:
> On 07/16/2009 11:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Two users of ar9170 devices have now reported their cards
> > have been programmed with a regulatory domain of 0x8000.
> > This is not a valid regulatory domain as such these users w
Two users of ar9170 devices have now reported their cards
have been programmed with a regulatory domain of 0x8000.
This is not a valid regulatory domain as such these users were
unable to use these devices. Since this doesn't seem to be
a device EEPROM corruption we must treat it specially. It
may
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:07:49PM -0700, Sinan Akman wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It
> > should have our ar9280 MAC.
> >
> > http://www.mikrotik-shop.de/product_info.php?info=p513_MikroTik-RouterBoard-R52N.html
>
>FWIW
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:31:40AM -0700, Carlos Kosloff wrote:
>
> *-network UNCLAIMED
> description: Ethernet controller
> product: AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter
> vendor: Atheros Communications Inc.
> physical id: 0
> bus info: p...@:03:00.0
> version: 01
> width: 64 bits
>
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:31:40AM -0700, Carlos Kosloff wrote:
>> *-network UNCLAIMED
>> description: Ethernet controller
>> product: AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter
>> vendor: Atheros Communications Inc.
>> physical id: 0
>> bus info: p...@:03:00.0
>>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Clyde McPherson wrote:
> I have a Ubiquiti SR71C (Atheros AR9220) Cardbus and work fine (B & G
> modes). Associates good and monitor mode works. I haven't tried N yet, I
> need to get a N router.
Nice, mind showing the output of loading ath9k?
Luis
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:07:49PM -0700, Sinan Akman wrote:
>> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It
>>> should have our ar9280 MAC.
>>>
>>> http://www.mikrotik-shop.de/product_info.php?info=p513_MikroTik-Router
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:14:37PM -0700, Sinan Akman wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:07:49PM -0700, Sinan Akman wrote:
> >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It
> >>> should have our ar9280 MAC.
> >>>
>
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:14:37PM -0700, Sinan Akman wrote:
>> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 05:07:49PM -0700, Sinan Akman wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It
> should
I have a Ubiquiti SR71C (Atheros AR9220) Cardbus and work fine (B & G
modes). Associates good and monitor mode works. I haven't tried N yet, I
need to get a N router.
Clyde McPherson
> Curious if anyone has tested ath9k with this card or any ar9220s. It
> should have our ar9280 MAC.
>
> http://
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:59:00AM -0700, Clyde McPherson wrote:
> I have a Ubiquiti SR71C (Atheros AR9220) Cardbus and work fine (B & G
> modes). Associates good and monitor mode works. I haven't tried N yet, I
> need to get a N router.
what's the output of loading ath9k on this? First Cardbus du
11 matches
Mail list logo
