since iperf testing costs a lot of the CPU resource on the router,here is my
topology:
PC_A <--> SU <--> AP <--> PC_B
Iset up the ethernet connection between PC_A and SU, PC_B and the AP,there was
wireless 11n connection between the SU and the AP, the APuses a bridge for
wlan0 and eth0, the
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 18:13 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> If you want to create a bug report, please use bugzilla.kernel.org.
Maybe we could open a bug and then write something like this on the
ath9k page:
D-Link DWL-552 (revision X is affected by the bug NNN)
Ubiquiti SR71-12 (affected by the bu
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 06:51 -0500, Brian Walker wrote:
> Ok. The only reason I purchased the DWA-552 was because it was listed at
> http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k/products/external as
> supported by the ath9k driver. I am always very careful with hardware I
> buy to make sure i
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
wrote:
> I run these tests on Wireless A/G.
>
> Can you please let me know what are the overheads for this performance
> degradation.
802.11 MAC, plus IP headers, etc. E.g. in the MAC, a single packet
transmission includes the DCF interfame
Hello bob,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> wrote:
>> Here is my test with iperf, even though iperf client does not work so
>> I used iperf server and get speed of approx 19 Mbits/sec. Now my issue
>> is why speed is
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:07:45PM -0800, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>>> Hello Luis,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>>> wrot
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 01:45 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> With wireless-testing I am getting oops. I am attaching it picture.
I reported it yesterday and Sujith sent a patch for that. Please see
"ath9k: Fix panic on driver load" in the list archives.
If sending images, please try to co
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
wrote:
> Here is my test with iperf, even though iperf client does not work so
> I used iperf server and get speed of approx 19 Mbits/sec. Now my issue
> is why speed is soo slow ?
Is your AP n-capable? You won't get much above 20 Mbps TCP
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:38:56PM -0800, hong zhang wrote:
>
>
> --- On Mon, 1/11/10, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > From: Luis R. Rodriguez
> > Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR6102 driver
> > To: "hong zhang"
> > Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
> > Date: Monday, January 11, 2010, 7:25 PM
> > O
On 01/14/2010 01:15 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Brian Walker :
>
>> Thanks for continuing to work on this. My DWA-552 is indeed a PCI (not
>> PCI-express) card. Perhaps the ath9k list of supported cards should be
>> updated for the version of the DWA-552 that I have?
>
> The Wiki should be op
Hello list,
i'm experiencing a very weak signal strength using ath9k and ar928x wireless in
a wndr3700 router. I placed two of these approximately 3 meters line of sight
of each other, and see signal strength of about -90dbm in mesh mode [1].
The problem counts for sending and receiving, also in
11 matches
Mail list logo
