Sujith wrote:
> Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> > I am seeing this as well on 2.6.33-rc4-wl, but only at unload
> > time (modprobe -r ath9k).
>
> Yep, this happens because I changed the debug mask for that message
> to FATAL. It is harmless, but can be fixed by cleaning up the
> virtual wiphy / idle st
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> I am seeing this as well on 2.6.33-rc4-wl, but only at unload time
> (modprobe -r ath9k).
Yep, this happens because I changed the debug mask for that message to FATAL.
It is harmless, but can be fixed by cleaning up the virtual wiphy / idle stuff.
Sujith
___
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > [302214.359875] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
>> > frame
>> > [302214.359900] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>>
>> What kernel?
>
> The one that I reported using in the disconnec
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > [302214.359875] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last
> > frame
> > [302214.359900] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL!
>
> What kernel?
The one that I reported using in the disconnect thread. I'll repeat
in this thread. Sorry that I forgot to m
Luis R. Rodriguez a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 06:31:19PM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
>> Today when I came home and resumed my system I got these messages
>> from the driver:
>>
>> [302214.156400] phy1: device no longer idle - scanning
>> [302214.341494] ath: ath_isr status=0009 imask
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 06:31:19PM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Today when I came home and resumed my system I got these messages
> from the driver:
>
> [302214.156400] phy1: device no longer idle - scanning
> [302214.341494] ath: ath_isr status=0009 imask=f4001071 wecare=0001
> [302214.341
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 04:35:36PM -0800, Lenin Ravindranath S wrote:
> I am running 2.6.27.37-170.2.104.fc10.i686.
I should note your ath9k in 2.6.27 is ancient, try stable:
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable/
Luis
___
ath9k-devel m
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:39:29PM -0800, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Frode V. Fjeld wrote:
> > I tried to run the module with debug=1, and there was something that
> > looks suspicious to me:
> >
> > Jan 16 01:21:09 tv kernel: [ 4432.020973] ath9k: NETWORK SLEEP -> AWAKE
> > Jan 16 01:21:09 tv kerne
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:29:20PM -0800, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 06:54:23AM -0800, Porsch, Marco wrote:
> >>> >>> Hello list,
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> i'm experiencing a very weak signal strength using ath9k and ar928x
> >>> >>> wireless in a wndr3700 router. I placed two o
