Re: [ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
sorry, I mean the station. I'm not sure where the problem is, I got an avg. 30Mbps( cpu load is <80%) throughput with my AP( cpu load is avg. 60% ) that built from OpenWrt latest trunk, and a 50Mbps( cpu load is 95% on the station ) with a Compex wp543 AP( cpu load is avg. 70%), while my AP

Re: [ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
if I did the iperf testing in the opposite direction, ( I used to set iperf client at PC2 and the server at PC1, not it's the client at PC1 and server at PC2 ) I got a avg. 55Mbps throughput rate, and maximum 60Mbps, it's still not alright for HT40, even for HT20. why the CPU load is almost

Re: [ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
Thank you. I did my test again with r19510 the latest one, and I got the avg. throughput like 45Mbps under HT40, the iw showed: r...@openwrt:/# iw wlan0 station dump Station 00:80:48:5f:6f:1e (on wlan0) inactive time: 190 ms rx bytes: 1234509163 rx packets: 115

[ath9k-devel] weak signal strength using ar928x

2010-02-03 Thread Goo Mail
All, On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 06:54:23AM -0800, Porsch, Marco wrote: > i'm experiencing a very weak signal strength using ath9k and ar928x wireless > in a wndr3700 router. I placed >two of these approximately 3 meters line of sight of each other, and see >signal strength of about -90dbm in > mes

Re: [ath9k-devel] EnGenius EMP9602 mini-PCI Wireless Card

2010-02-03 Thread rootkit85
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Cristian Talle wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get the EnGenius EMP9602 mini-PCI Wireless Card (Atheros > AR9160 + AR 9103) working on a Micrel KS8695P system (arm 922T) with > kernel 2.6.32.5. > The card runs fine except for the messages I'm getting in the system lo

Re: [ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2010-02-03 9:44 AM, oii...@aol.com wrote: > > I use IXP425( CPU 533M, 64M RAM ) platform, OpenWrt r18530 with > compat-wireless-2009-11-21. > As an AP, it worked just good I could see an average throughput like > 70~80Mbps under HT40( the throughput limited by the 100M ethernet in my > test env

[ath9k-devel] no mas

2010-02-03 Thread Jaime Lozano Padilla
Por favor nomas infomacion Ya me quiero salir Atentamente: Jaime Lozano Padilla Administrador de Bases de Datos Oracle Teléfono: 5322-0497 ext. 85454 Email: jaime.loz...@fovissste.gob.mx ADVERTENCIA LEGAL Este mensaje contiene información confidencial y privilegiada. Se entiend

[ath9k-devel] EnGenius EMP9602 mini-PCI Wireless Card

2010-02-03 Thread Cristian Talle
Hi, I'm trying to get the EnGenius EMP9602 mini-PCI Wireless Card (Atheros AR9160 + AR 9103) working on a Micrel KS8695P system (arm 922T) with kernel 2.6.32.5. The card runs fine except for the messages I'm getting in the system log : Feb 2 17:02:33 (none) user.debug kernel: ath9k: received PC

Re: [ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-02-03 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:56 PM, wrote: > OK, I found it was actually the SU What's an SU? ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k in wireless-testing won't work in AP mode

2010-02-03 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:29:42PM -0800, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > > On 2010-02-03 1:27 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > >> Well so what I meant is that we should ensure hardware i

[ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
I use IXP425( CPU 533M, 64M RAM ) platform, OpenWrt r18530 with compat-wireless-2009-11-21. As an AP, it worked just good I could see an average throughput like 70~80Mbps under HT40( the throughput limited by the 100M ethernet in my test environment). As a SU, I tested with a compex wp543