Re: [ath9k-devel] AR5008 hanging computer

2010-02-22 Thread James Grossmann
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:45 AM, James Grossmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 09:56 -0800, hong zhang wrote: >>> > > >>> > I'm also sorry about that, on the other hand, there are >>> > many schools >>> > of thought on answering posts, bu

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR5008 hanging computer

2010-02-22 Thread James Grossmann
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 09:56 -0800, hong zhang wrote: >> > > >> > I'm also sorry about that, on the other hand, there are >> > many schools >> > of thought on answering posts, but I don't want this to be >> > a >> > discussion of that. >> > I

Re: [ath9k-devel] Ath9k MIMO Performance versus Proprietary Drivers

2010-02-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2010-02-22 8:43 PM, Galen wrote: > On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:29 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >>> *** Discussion *** While I realize some of my examples are rather >>> extreme, they clearly demonstrate the huge disparity between ath9k >>> and proprietary drivers. I suspect that ath9k may have inferior

Re: [ath9k-devel] Ath9k MIMO Performance versus Proprietary Drivers

2010-02-22 Thread Galen
On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:29 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> *** Discussion *** While I realize some of my examples are rather >> extreme, they clearly demonstrate the huge disparity between ath9k >> and proprietary drivers. I suspect that ath9k may have inferior MIMO >> support code (MRC, beamforming, et

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k-devel Digest, Vol 20, Issue 28

2010-02-22 Thread Sascha Rehberg
The problem of unstable wireless as soon as you download big chunks of data has been completely solved for me since I have changed from Ubuntu Karmic Koala to Mandriva Power Pack - works perfectly fine...don't know what they did but it works On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 19:34 +0100, ath9k-devel-requ...@l

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR5008 hanging computer

2010-02-22 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:24:57AM -0800, Tomi Orava wrote: > Quoting "Luis R. Rodriguez" : > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Tomi Orava > > wrote: > >> On 02/18/2010 11:58 PM, Mark Sutton wrote: > >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:31:26PM -0800, Mark Sutton wrote: > Hi, >      I hav

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR5008 hanging computer

2010-02-22 Thread Tomi Orava
Quoting "Luis R. Rodriguez" : > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Tomi Orava > wrote: >> On 02/18/2010 11:58 PM, Mark Sutton wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:31:26PM -0800, Mark Sutton wrote: Hi,      I have this problem as well. Hardware is: Atheros Communications I

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR5008 hanging computer

2010-02-22 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Tomi Orava wrote: > On 02/18/2010 11:58 PM, Mark Sutton wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:31:26PM -0800, Mark Sutton wrote: >>> Hi, >>>      I have this problem as well. >>> Hardware is: >>> >>> Atheros Communications Inc. AR5008 >>> Atheros AR5416 MAC/BB Rev:2

Re: [ath9k-devel] Ath9k MIMO Performance versus Proprietary Drivers

2010-02-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2010-02-21 9:41 PM, Galen wrote: > Hello All, > > I have been testing out ath9k in a variety of situations. I have > observed it appears to have poorer handling in MIMO-intensive > environments than the binary drivers under Mac OS X and Windows. I > have two computers with identical radios (3x3