Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: noise floor calibration process

2010-04-28 Thread Benoit PAPILLAULT
RHS Linux User a écrit : Hi All, preaching The chip *FOR SURE* *CANNOT* measure the thermal noise level!! It isn't that sensitive. That said under some conditions it CAN measure the local interference level which IS useful. In fact, that's what I thought first, but according to

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: noise floor calibration process

2010-04-28 Thread Holger Schurig
In the USA Amateur radio operators can use 1000 Watts (under certain conditions) !! Don't count on the 1000 W. Most countries have tight restrictions, only allowing certain frequencies, bandwiths, max PEP, max ERP, max EIRP, max electric field, max magnetic fields. In Germany, with my

[ath9k-devel] kernel warning on 2.6.33 ath9k

2010-04-28 Thread Xu, Martin
Hi I found that kernel reports below warning when using ath9k in kernel 2.6.33. Someone can kindly tell me whether it is the new found issue or the issue is known and has been fixed in later commit in git tree? Thanks! [ cut here ] WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:143

Re: [ath9k-devel] oprofile the ath9k for low throughput rate and 3 questions

2010-04-28 Thread Dave Taht
On 04/19/2010 07:05 PM, oii...@aol.com wrote: I got avg. 60Mbps of the throughput rate by iperf testing and had the testing environment like below: OpenWrt: r18529 (I tried the latest r20851 and the throughput rate could be even worse ) AP STA h/w platform: IXP425

Re: [ath9k-devel] kernel warning on 2.6.33 ath9k

2010-04-28 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0800, Xu, Martin wrote: Hi I found that kernel reports below warning when using ath9k in kernel 2.6.33. Someone can kindly tell me whether it is the new found issue or the issue is known and has been fixed in later commit in git tree? Thanks! Looks like

Re: [ath9k-devel] Radar Detection and DFS status

2010-04-28 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Robert Meschke r_mesc...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, I want to use GHz channels for outdoor WLAN communications in Germany. In this regdomain all outdoor 5GHz channels are DFS channels. I need 11n connection speeds. What's the status of DFS and Radar Detection in

Re: [ath9k-devel] oprofile the ath9k for low throughput rate and 3 questions

2010-04-28 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:17:47AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: On 04/19/2010 07:05 PM, oii...@aol.commailto:oii...@aol.com wrote: I got avg. 60Mbps of the throughput rate by iperf testing and had the testing environment like below: OpenWrt: r18529 (I tried the latest

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Added get_survey callback in order to get channel noise

2010-04-28 Thread Benoit PAPILLAULT
Jouni Malinen a écrit : On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:08 -0700, Benoit Papillault wrote: +static int ath9k_get_survey(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int idx, + struct survey_info *survey) +struct ieee80211_conf *conf = hw-conf; + + if (idx != 0) +

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: noise floor calibration process

2010-04-28 Thread Peter Stuge
Holger Schurig wrote: Now two high powered, low noise Acess Points with a clear line of sight would give some real range! HAMNET And http://tier.cs.berkeley.edu/wiki/Wireless which changes the MAC layer a bit, for very nice gain in performance. //Peter