I've seen sparse reports of individuals getting in excess of 100mbps (tcp)
with atheros cards using ath9k. It seems almost everyone tops out at
~80mbps, this isn't just limited to minipci modules, most consumer level
hardware using similar chips also tops out in this range (see
http://www.smallnetb
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:02:44AM -0700, Daniel Yingqiang Ma wrote:
>> Could you clarify a little more about the AR9160? Is it also an
>> unfortunate one as well?
>> It seems we have been unlucky to choose this one...
>
> AR9160 is part
According 802.11n standard, when using an A-MPDU, there is a PPDU duration
constraint of 10 ms. In ath9k, the function ath_tx_form_aggr in xmit.c
limits the duration of each A-MPDU to 4ms by computing the duration
corresponding to the intended rate to b used.
In my previous discussion on this list
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:02:44AM -0700, Daniel Yingqiang Ma wrote:
> Could you clarify a little more about the AR9160? Is it also an
> unfortunate one as well?
> It seems we have been unlucky to choose this one...
AR9160 is part of the AR9100 family.
Luis
_
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:20:02AM +0530, sujith.manoha...@atheros.com wrote:
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The original code had ENDPOINT_MAX and HST_ENDPOINT_MAX switched.
> >
> > Also the first loop was off by one, it started past the end of the array
> > and went down to 1 instead of going down t
Could you clarify a little more about the AR9160? Is it also an
unfortunate one as well?
It seems we have been unlucky to choose this one...
Thanks,
-Daniel
2010/5/11 Luis R. Rodriguez :
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:59:02PM -0700, Björn Smedman wrote:
>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Peter Stug
