Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Masahiro Inoue
Mr. Mohammed Thank you for the reply. > As ath9k works very well in 'g' mode it should have provided backward > compatibility for 'b' mode I am really not very sure about this. > Any way we will look into this. I see. I also examine it as much as possible. > Old ath5k ? (based on your sniffer c

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Masahiro Inoue wrote: > Mr. Mohammed > > Thank you for the reply. > >> Can you able to establish connection between the client and server >> without any problems ? >> I understand that your Sony client is working in 802.11 'b' mode >> where as your Azurwav server u

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Masahiro Inoue
Mr. Mohammed Thank you for the reply. > Can you able to establish connection between the client and server > without any problems ? > I understand that your Sony client is working in 802.11 'b' mode > where as your Azurwav server using ath9k always works in 'g' mode > thats why you are getting 5

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Masahiro Inoue wrote: > Mr. Mohammed > > Thank you for the reply. > >> Thanks .You are observing any functionality problem like disconnection >> rather than what is observed in the sniffer trace about that "Extended >> rates" > > I'm sorry. > I do not know. > Could

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Masahiro Inoue
Mr. Mohammed Thank you for the reply. > Thanks .You are observing any functionality problem like disconnection > rather than what is observed in the sniffer trace about that "Extended > rates" I'm sorry. I do not know. Could you tell me in simple words a little more? Sincerely yours By the way

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Masahiro Inoue wrote: > Mr. Mohammed > > Thank you for the reply. > >> Can you please tell what card you are using ? > > Sorry. > Is it good in information on lspci? > Information on the card that I am using is this. > kernel version is 2.6.27. > > $ lspci -v -s 04

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Masahiro Inoue
Mr. Mohammed Thank you for the reply. > Can you please tell what card you are using ? Sorry. Is it good in information on lspci? Information on the card that I am using is this. kernel version is 2.6.27. $ lspci -v -s 04:00 04:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR928X Wireless

Re: [ath9k-devel] bug ath9k+hostapd can't associate and corrupted client state?

2010-12-16 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Halperin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Daniel Halperin wrote: >>> I'm using Ubiquiti SR71E based on AR9280, on Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS, with >>> wireless-testing most recent >>> (5c29814cbf011b9570636631fa605aa539b4619c), hosta

Re: [ath9k-devel] BUG?

2010-12-16 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Masahiro Inoue wrote: > Hello, > > It is as follows in the packet from the client side. > Supported Rates: 1.0(B) 2.0(B) 5.5(B) 11.0(B) > > It is as follows in the response packet from the servers end to this. > Data Rate: 54.0 Mb/s > > Isn't the problem in this?